MedXplain-VQA: Multi-Component Explainable Medical Visual Question Answering
Hai-Dang Nguyen, Minh-Anh Dang, Minh-Tan Le, Minh-Tuan Le
TL;DR
MedXplain-VQA advances explainable medical visual question answering by integrating domain-adapted vision-language modeling with medical query reformulation, enhanced visual grounding, precise region localization, and structured chain-of-thought reasoning via multi-modal LLMs. A novel medical-domain evaluation framework replaces traditional NLP metrics to assess terminology coverage, clinical structure, attention relevance, and reasoning confidence. On 500 PathVQA histopathology samples, the system achieves a composite score of $0.683$ and reasoning confidence of $0.890$, identifying 3–5 diagnostically relevant regions per sample and producing clinically coherent explanations averaging 57 words. The results underscore the value of systematic component integration—particularly medical query reformulation and chain-of-thought reasoning—for enhancing transparency and educational utility in clinical AI, while highlighting computational and validation challenges to be addressed for clinical deployment.
Abstract
Explainability is critical for the clinical adoption of medical visual question answering (VQA) systems, as physicians require transparent reasoning to trust AI-generated diagnoses. We present MedXplain-VQA, a comprehensive framework integrating five explainable AI components to deliver interpretable medical image analysis. The framework leverages a fine-tuned BLIP-2 backbone, medical query reformulation, enhanced Grad-CAM attention, precise region extraction, and structured chain-of-thought reasoning via multi-modal language models. To evaluate the system, we introduce a medical-domain-specific framework replacing traditional NLP metrics with clinically relevant assessments, including terminology coverage, clinical structure quality, and attention region relevance. Experiments on 500 PathVQA histopathology samples demonstrate substantial improvements, with the enhanced system achieving a composite score of 0.683 compared to 0.378 for baseline methods, while maintaining high reasoning confidence (0.890). Our system identifies 3-5 diagnostically relevant regions per sample and generates structured explanations averaging 57 words with appropriate clinical terminology. Ablation studies reveal that query reformulation provides the most significant initial improvement, while chain-of-thought reasoning enables systematic diagnostic processes. These findings underscore the potential of MedXplain-VQA as a robust, explainable medical VQA system. Future work will focus on validation with medical experts and large-scale clinical datasets to ensure clinical readiness.
