Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Abhyankar valuations, Prüfer-Manis valuations, and perfectoid Tate algebras

Dimitri Dine, Jack J Garzella

TL;DR

The paper analyzes quotient fields of the perfectoid Tate algebra $T_{n,K}^{\operatorname{perfd}}$ over a perfectoid field $K$, proving that every quotient is a semi-immediate extension of a completed-perfection field $K_{r_{1},\dots,r_{l}}^{\operatorname{perfd}}$, with an optimal bound on the number of radii $l \le \min\left(n-\operatorname{ht}(\frak m^{\flat}\cap (T_{n,K^{\flat}})^{\operatorname{coperf}}),\ n-1\right)$. The authors develop a valuation-theoretic framework centered on topologically simple valuations and their Prüfer-Manis interpretation, distinguishing rational vs irrational Abhyankar valuations and connecting these to Berkovich-type points via Gauss norms and Temkin’s reduction. A key methodological pillar is tilting to characteristic $p$ to transfer the problem to Abhyankar valuation theory, combined with Gleason-style division arguments to realize surjections onto completed perfections and Noether normalization to control dimensions. The results illuminate the structure of perfectoid finite-type geometry by clarifying which quotient fields can arise and how they sit inside semi-immediate towers, with implications for Berkovich geometry and the interplay between valuation theory and perfectoid algebra. The work also provides a bridge between topological simplicity and valuation-theoretic finiteness, showing that topologically simple valuations coincide with Prüfer-Manis valuations and thereby constrain the landscape of possible quotient fields.

Abstract

Let $K$ be a perfectoid field. We describe all quotient fields of the perfectoid Tate algebra\begin{equation*}T_{n,K}^{\text{perfd}}=K\langle X_{1}^{1/p^{\infty}},\dots, X_{n}^{1/p^{\infty}}\rangle\end{equation*}in any number $n\geq1$ of variables in terms of (completed perfections of) the nonarchimedean fields $K_{r_1,\dots,r_l}$ occuring in Berkovich geometry. We prove that every quotient field\begin{equation*}L=T_{n,K}^{\text{perfd}}/\mathfrak{m}\end{equation*}is a so-called \textit{semi-immediate} extension of $K_{r_1,\dots,r_l}^{\text{perfd}}$ for some\begin{equation*}l\leq\min(n-\text{ht}(\mathfrak{m}^{\flat}\cap (T_{n,K^{\flat}})^{\text{coperf}}),n-1), \end{equation*}which pins down the value groups and the residue fields of the possible quotient fields $L$. Moreover, we show that if\begin{equation*}\mathfrak{m}^{\flat}\cap(T_{n,K^{\flat}})^{\text{coperf}}\neq 0,\end{equation*} at least one of the radii $r_{i}$ has to be irrational, i.e.,\begin{equation*}r_{i}\not\in\sqrt{|K^{\times}|}.\end{equation*} The main ingredient in our proof is the notion of \textit{topologically simple} valuations, which generalize type (IV) points in the classification of points on $\text{Spa}(K\langle T\rangle)$ to the case of higher-dimensional polydisks. We also consider \textit{rational Abhyankar} valuations and \textit{irrational Abhyankar} valuations, which generalize type (II) and (III) points, respectively. We deduce our main result from a description of topologically simple absolute values and of Abhyankar absolute values on usual Tate algebra. Along the way, we also show that our topologically simple valuations are the same as Prüfer-Manis valuations in the sense of Knebusch-Zhang. Finally, we also show that all allowed possibilities for the quotient fields $L$ do indeed occur (i.e., the above bound $l\leq n-1$ is optimal) by generalizing an example of Gleason.

Abhyankar valuations, Prüfer-Manis valuations, and perfectoid Tate algebras

TL;DR

The paper analyzes quotient fields of the perfectoid Tate algebra over a perfectoid field , proving that every quotient is a semi-immediate extension of a completed-perfection field , with an optimal bound on the number of radii . The authors develop a valuation-theoretic framework centered on topologically simple valuations and their Prüfer-Manis interpretation, distinguishing rational vs irrational Abhyankar valuations and connecting these to Berkovich-type points via Gauss norms and Temkin’s reduction. A key methodological pillar is tilting to characteristic to transfer the problem to Abhyankar valuation theory, combined with Gleason-style division arguments to realize surjections onto completed perfections and Noether normalization to control dimensions. The results illuminate the structure of perfectoid finite-type geometry by clarifying which quotient fields can arise and how they sit inside semi-immediate towers, with implications for Berkovich geometry and the interplay between valuation theory and perfectoid algebra. The work also provides a bridge between topological simplicity and valuation-theoretic finiteness, showing that topologically simple valuations coincide with Prüfer-Manis valuations and thereby constrain the landscape of possible quotient fields.

Abstract

Let be a perfectoid field. We describe all quotient fields of the perfectoid Tate algebra\begin{equation*}T_{n,K}^{\text{perfd}}=K\langle X_{1}^{1/p^{\infty}},\dots, X_{n}^{1/p^{\infty}}\rangle\end{equation*}in any number of variables in terms of (completed perfections of) the nonarchimedean fields occuring in Berkovich geometry. We prove that every quotient field\begin{equation*}L=T_{n,K}^{\text{perfd}}/\mathfrak{m}\end{equation*}is a so-called \textit{semi-immediate} extension of for some\begin{equation*}l\leq\min(n-\text{ht}(\mathfrak{m}^{\flat}\cap (T_{n,K^{\flat}})^{\text{coperf}}),n-1), \end{equation*}which pins down the value groups and the residue fields of the possible quotient fields . Moreover, we show that if\begin{equation*}\mathfrak{m}^{\flat}\cap(T_{n,K^{\flat}})^{\text{coperf}}\neq 0,\end{equation*} at least one of the radii has to be irrational, i.e.,\begin{equation*}r_{i}\not\in\sqrt{|K^{\times}|}.\end{equation*} The main ingredient in our proof is the notion of \textit{topologically simple} valuations, which generalize type (IV) points in the classification of points on to the case of higher-dimensional polydisks. We also consider \textit{rational Abhyankar} valuations and \textit{irrational Abhyankar} valuations, which generalize type (II) and (III) points, respectively. We deduce our main result from a description of topologically simple absolute values and of Abhyankar absolute values on usual Tate algebra. Along the way, we also show that our topologically simple valuations are the same as Prüfer-Manis valuations in the sense of Knebusch-Zhang. Finally, we also show that all allowed possibilities for the quotient fields do indeed occur (i.e., the above bound is optimal) by generalizing an example of Gleason.
Paper Structure (19 sections, 64 theorems, 102 equations, 3 figures)

This paper contains 19 sections, 64 theorems, 102 equations, 3 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.2

Let $\mathfrak{m}\subsetneq T_{n, K}^{\operatorname{perfd}}$ be a maximal ideal of the perfectoid Tate algebra $T_{n, K}^{\operatorname{perfd}}=K\langle X_{1}^{1 / p^{\infty}}, \ldots, X_{n}^{1 / p^{\infty}}\rangle$ and let be the corresponding quotient field. Then there exists a polyradius $(r_1,\dots, r_l)\in (0, 1]^{l}$ such that $L$ is a semi-immediate extension of $K_{r_{1},\dots, r_{l}}$, w

Figures (3)

  • Figure 6.3: A picture of $(q,s)$-adapted when $n=1$ for the element $\beta = \sum_{j \in \mathbb{Z}[1 / p]}^{} b_{j}x^{j} \subset K_{r}^{\operatorname{perfd}}$. Note that the picture is lying slightly, the $j$-axis should extend in the negative direction as well.
  • Figure 6.5: A picture of $\operatorname{res}^{M \leq} f$ when $n=1$, which consists of the (finitely many) terms of $f$ who have norm greater than $M$.
  • Figure 6.9: A picture of a Gleason element, for $n=1$ and $J = \mathbb{Z}[\frac{1}{p}]_{\geq 0}$. Some $p$-th root of a linear combination of $\beta$ and monomials is $(q,s)$-adapted. The $(q,s)$-adapted elements and the corresponding linear combination are obtained recursively by eliminating previous terms.

Theorems & Definitions (148)

  • Theorem 1.2: Theorem \ref{['Main theorem, in the body of the paper']}
  • Theorem 1.3: Theorem \ref{['thm:multivar:gleason']}, Corollary \ref{['cor:perftate:finext']}, Corollary \ref{['cor:perftate:finext2']}
  • Theorem 1.5: Theorem \ref{['Topologically simple rules out Abhyankar']}
  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2: Immediate extension
  • Definition 2.3: Semi-immediate extension
  • Definition 2.4: The fields $K_{r_1,\dots, r_n}$
  • Lemma 2.5
  • proof
  • Remark 2.6
  • ...and 138 more