Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Barriers to Integrating Low-Power IoT in Engineering Education: A Survey of the Literature

V. Sanchez Padilla, Albert Espinal, Jose Cordova-Garcia, Lisa Schibelius

TL;DR

The paper surveys recent literature to identify and categorize barriers to integrating low-power IoT in engineering education. It adopts a thematic literature survey and case studies, classifying barriers into technical, organizational, and curricular/pedagogical groups, and provides practical examples for each. Key barriers include energy-management challenges, multi-vendor interoperability, cost and maintenance, faculty readiness, and limited curricular time, with platform and budget-driven choices shaping lab design. The work offers actionable guidance for educators and institutional leaders to plan, fund, and implement IoT testbeds and curricula that align with industry practices.

Abstract

Low-power Internet of Things (IoT) technologies are becoming increasingly important in engineering education as a tool to help students connect theory to real applications. However, many institutions face barriers that slow down their adoption in courses and labs. This paper reviews recent studies to understand these barriers and organizes them into three groups: technical, organizational, and curricular/pedagogical. Technical barriers include energy management, scalability, and integration issues. Organizational barriers are related to cost, planning, and the need for trained staff. Curricular and pedagogical barriers include gaps in student readiness, limited lab time, and platform choices that depend on budget. By detailing these barriers with practical examples, this paper aims to help educators and academic leaders develop more effective strategies to adopt low-power IoT in engineering programs.

Barriers to Integrating Low-Power IoT in Engineering Education: A Survey of the Literature

TL;DR

The paper surveys recent literature to identify and categorize barriers to integrating low-power IoT in engineering education. It adopts a thematic literature survey and case studies, classifying barriers into technical, organizational, and curricular/pedagogical groups, and provides practical examples for each. Key barriers include energy-management challenges, multi-vendor interoperability, cost and maintenance, faculty readiness, and limited curricular time, with platform and budget-driven choices shaping lab design. The work offers actionable guidance for educators and institutional leaders to plan, fund, and implement IoT testbeds and curricula that align with industry practices.

Abstract

Low-power Internet of Things (IoT) technologies are becoming increasingly important in engineering education as a tool to help students connect theory to real applications. However, many institutions face barriers that slow down their adoption in courses and labs. This paper reviews recent studies to understand these barriers and organizes them into three groups: technical, organizational, and curricular/pedagogical. Technical barriers include energy management, scalability, and integration issues. Organizational barriers are related to cost, planning, and the need for trained staff. Curricular and pedagogical barriers include gaps in student readiness, limited lab time, and platform choices that depend on budget. By detailing these barriers with practical examples, this paper aims to help educators and academic leaders develop more effective strategies to adopt low-power IoT in engineering programs.
Paper Structure (8 sections, 4 figures, 3 tables)

This paper contains 8 sections, 4 figures, 3 tables.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Short-range IoT technologies comparison
  • Figure 2: Long-range IoT technologies comparison
  • Figure 3: Low-power IoT: Data Rate vs. Range
  • Figure 4: Barriers classified according to themes