Resilient Composite Control for Stability Enhancement in EV Integrated DC Microgrids
Md Saiful Islam, Rahul Bhadani
TL;DR
This paper tackles stability challenges in EV-integrated DC microgrids that arise from CPL-induced negative impedance and low inertia by proposing a composite control framework. It integrates exact feedback linearization to Brunovsky canonical form, a virtual capacitor to emulate inertia, and a global integral terminal sliding mode backstepping controller with an improved fractional power reaching law to reduce chattering and accelerate convergence, with stability proven via Lyapunov analysis. The approach is validated through MATLAB/Simulink simulations under variable DC-bus references, fluctuating supply voltages, and time-varying control delays, showing substantial reductions in overshoot, undershoot, and settling time compared to a baseline sliding mode controller. The results indicate improved voltage regulation, robustness to disturbances, and potential for practical deployment in EV charging DC microgrids, with future work focusing on adaptivity, cyber-physical security, and AI-assisted parameter tuning.
Abstract
When electric vehicles (EVs) are integrated into standalone DC microgrids (DCMGs), stability issues arise due to their constant power load (CPL) behavior, which provides negative incremental impedance (NII). In addition, the microgrids suffer from an inherent low-inertia problem. Therefore, this study presents a composite controller incorporating a global integral terminal sliding mode controller with a backstepping controller. A virtual capacitor is employed to mitigate the low-inertia issue and strengthen the DC-bus response. An improved fractional power-based reaching law decreases chattering and accelerates convergence. Exact feedback linearization converts the nonlinear boost converter model into Brunovsky's canonical form, mitigating NII effects and non-minimum phase issues. The entire system stability is verified using Lyapunov control theory. Simulation outcomes confirm superior performance, with 34.4-53.3% reduction in overshoot, 52.9-74.9% in undershoot, and 12-47.4% in settling time compared to the existing controller.
