Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Can Bose-Einstein condensates enhance radioactive decay?

Hanzhen Lin, Yukun Lu, Wolfgang Ketterle

TL;DR

The paper analyzes proposals to use Bose-Einstein condensates to enhance radioactive decay, showing that single-body decay cannot be altered by many-body coherence and that collective enhancement requires maintaining coherence with decay products, which is not feasible for MeV-energy channels. It derives a general gain-threshold framework $G = N \Gamma \Omega$ with a multi-mode solid-angle factor $\Omega \approx (\lambda/d)^2$ and a coherence-time constraint $\tau_{\mathrm{coh}}$, predicting vanishing gains ($\sim 10^{-20}$) for gamma- and neutrino-emission scenarios. By examining specific gamma-ray, neutrino, and positronium-based proposals, the authors argue that incorrect assumptions about condensate 'memory' and an overestimated coherence time lead to misleading conclusions, and that practical amplification remains far from realizable. Overall, while the formalism clarifies when collective emission can occur in radioactive systems, BEC-based enhancement of decay at MeV energies remains orders of magnitude below viable gamma- or neutrino-laser operation.

Abstract

This paper lays out the principles of how Bose-Einstein condensates can modify radioactive decay. We highlight the challenges of many modes and short coherence times due to the $\approx$ MeV energies of the emitted radiation. Recent proposals for gamma ray and neutrino lasers claim that using a Bose-Einstein condensate as a source would solve these issues. We show that this is not the case, and the proposed experiments would have a gain of only $10^{-20}$ or smaller. We also analyze proposals for gamma ray lasers based on stimulated annihilation of positronium Bose-Einstein condensates.

Can Bose-Einstein condensates enhance radioactive decay?

TL;DR

The paper analyzes proposals to use Bose-Einstein condensates to enhance radioactive decay, showing that single-body decay cannot be altered by many-body coherence and that collective enhancement requires maintaining coherence with decay products, which is not feasible for MeV-energy channels. It derives a general gain-threshold framework with a multi-mode solid-angle factor and a coherence-time constraint , predicting vanishing gains () for gamma- and neutrino-emission scenarios. By examining specific gamma-ray, neutrino, and positronium-based proposals, the authors argue that incorrect assumptions about condensate 'memory' and an overestimated coherence time lead to misleading conclusions, and that practical amplification remains far from realizable. Overall, while the formalism clarifies when collective emission can occur in radioactive systems, BEC-based enhancement of decay at MeV energies remains orders of magnitude below viable gamma- or neutrino-laser operation.

Abstract

This paper lays out the principles of how Bose-Einstein condensates can modify radioactive decay. We highlight the challenges of many modes and short coherence times due to the MeV energies of the emitted radiation. Recent proposals for gamma ray and neutrino lasers claim that using a Bose-Einstein condensate as a source would solve these issues. We show that this is not the case, and the proposed experiments would have a gain of only or smaller. We also analyze proposals for gamma ray lasers based on stimulated annihilation of positronium Bose-Einstein condensates.
Paper Structure (3 sections, 9 equations, 1 figure, 1 table)

This paper contains 3 sections, 9 equations, 1 figure, 1 table.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Superradiant "laserlike" emission of light has been observed from sodium BEC after laser excitation (a)SR_Rayleigh. Recently, it has been suggested that radioactive BEC can be used to realize gamma ray MARMUGI2018 and neutrino lasers neutrino_laser_jones_formaggio at MeV energies (b). Although superradiance of visible emission and gamma ray radiation are formally identical, the wavelength of MeV gamma rays is $10^6$ times shorter. As a result, many more photon modes (red) are populated, and the daughter atoms (olive) recoils faster and lose overlap with the parent atoms (blue) much sooner. In addition, the daughter atoms can be unstable and undergo secondary decays (gray), limiting the coherence time further.