Resilient Radio Access Networks: AI and the Unknown Unknowns
Bho Matthiesen, Armin Dekorsy, Petar Popovski
TL;DR
The paper addresses the problem of resilient radio access networks that must cope with unknown unknowns and extremely rare, high-impact disruptions. It analyzes three AI paradigms—risk minimization, empirical risk minimization, and online learning—and argues that standard statistical ML tends to ignore rare resilience events, motivating continual and causal approaches. The authors establish theoretical insights, including a formal proposition showing that risk minimization effectively deprioritizes resilience events, and discuss the limitations of current deep learning and reinforcement learning in handling severe distributional shifts, while outlining causal learning and lifelong RL as promising directions. They also discuss the potential and limitations of GPTs and large language models for resilience reasoning, emphasizing the need for human-like commonsense and safety-aware exploration. The work highlights the critical need to integrate continual learning, causal inference, and reasoning capabilities to build AI systems capable of robust, adaptive operation in unknown and dynamic wireless environments, with practical implications for future 5G/6G resilience engineering.
Abstract
5G networks offer exceptional reliability and availability, ensuring consistent performance and user satisfaction. Yet they might still fail when confronted with the unexpected. A resilient system is able to adapt to real-world complexity, including operating conditions completely unanticipated during system design. This makes resilience a vital attribute for communication systems that must sustain service in scenarios where models are absent or too intricate to provide statistical guarantees. Such considerations indicate that artifical intelligence (AI) will play a major role in delivering resilience. In this paper, we examine the challenges of designing AIs for resilient radio access networks, especially with respect to unanticipated and rare disruptions. Our theoretical results indicate strong limitations of current statistical learning methods for resilience and suggest connections to online learning and causal inference.
