Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On Local Limits of Sparse Random Graphs: Color Convergence and the Refined Configuration Model

Alexander Pluska, Sagar Malhotra

TL;DR

The paper introduces color convergence, a Weisfeiler-Leman-inspired local limit for sparse graphs, and proves it exactly characterizes probabilistic consistency of empirical risk for $k$-layer MPNNs. It then develops the Refined Configuration Model (RCM), a universal sparse graph model that captures color-convergent limits and local convergence to Galton–Watson trees, subsuming common models like Erdős–Rényi, SBM, and CM in the limit. The work formalizes a bridge between color refinement and learnability, providing a tractable generative framework with linear-time sampling under finite expected degree. Collectively, this framework yields a complete description of local limits in sparse graph regimes relevant to GNN learning and offers a principled basis for future extensions to higher-order WL methods and quantitative generalization bounds.

Abstract

Local convergence has emerged as a fundamental tool for analyzing sparse random graph models. We introduce a new notion of local convergence, color convergence, based on the Weisfeiler-Leman algorithm. Color convergence fully characterizes the class of random graphs that are well-behaved in the limit for message-passing graph neural networks. Building on this, we propose the Refined Configuration Model (RCM), a random graph model that generalizes the configuration model. The RCM is universal with respect to local convergence among locally tree-like random graph models, including Erdős-Rényi, stochastic block and configuration models. Finally, this framework enables a complete characterization of the random trees that arise as local limits of such graphs.

On Local Limits of Sparse Random Graphs: Color Convergence and the Refined Configuration Model

TL;DR

The paper introduces color convergence, a Weisfeiler-Leman-inspired local limit for sparse graphs, and proves it exactly characterizes probabilistic consistency of empirical risk for -layer MPNNs. It then develops the Refined Configuration Model (RCM), a universal sparse graph model that captures color-convergent limits and local convergence to Galton–Watson trees, subsuming common models like Erdős–Rényi, SBM, and CM in the limit. The work formalizes a bridge between color refinement and learnability, providing a tractable generative framework with linear-time sampling under finite expected degree. Collectively, this framework yields a complete description of local limits in sparse graph regimes relevant to GNN learning and offers a principled basis for future extensions to higher-order WL methods and quantitative generalization bounds.

Abstract

Local convergence has emerged as a fundamental tool for analyzing sparse random graph models. We introduce a new notion of local convergence, color convergence, based on the Weisfeiler-Leman algorithm. Color convergence fully characterizes the class of random graphs that are well-behaved in the limit for message-passing graph neural networks. Building on this, we propose the Refined Configuration Model (RCM), a random graph model that generalizes the configuration model. The RCM is universal with respect to local convergence among locally tree-like random graph models, including Erdős-Rényi, stochastic block and configuration models. Finally, this framework enables a complete characterization of the random trees that arise as local limits of such graphs.
Paper Structure (18 sections, 31 theorems, 65 equations, 3 figures)

This paper contains 18 sections, 31 theorems, 65 equations, 3 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 2.7

Let $G_t = \mathsf{CM}_t(\mu)$. Then $G_t$ converges locally to a GWT. That is, there exists a GWT $W_t$ such that for all $k\in\mathbb N$ and $B\in\mathcal{B}_k$$b_{k, \infty}(B) = \mathbb{P}(W_k \simeq B).$

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: Support and distribution of $W_1$.
  • Figure 2: Example demonstrating \ref{['prop:mp']}.
  • Figure 3: From left to right, we have: a table containing the assigned types, stubs occurring in steps 1, 2, and 3, and possible outputs $G_0$ and $G_1$ of the $\mathsf{RCM}$ algorithm.

Theorems & Definitions (74)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Definition 2.3
  • Example 2.4
  • Definition 2.5
  • Example 2.6
  • Theorem 2.7: van2024random
  • Remark 2.8
  • Definition 2.9
  • Example 2.10
  • ...and 64 more