Time-series Random Process Complexity Ranking Using a Bound on Conditional Differential Entropy
Jacob Ayers, Richard Hahnloser, Julia Ulrich, Lothar Sebastian Krapp, Remo Nitschke, Sabine Stoll, Balthasar Bickel, Reinhard Furrer
TL;DR
This work addresses ranking the intrinsic complexity of time-series when the underlying distribution is unknown. It builds a tractable framework by leveraging conditional differential entropy bounds that relate uncertainty in the next observation to the covariance of prediction errors, and extends these bounds with Hadamard's inequality to tighten the upper limit. The authors introduce PECEP, a prediction-error-based proxy for conditional entropy, and validate it through controlled VAR experiments with known entropy and a bio-inspired audio ranking task where entropy is unknown. The results show that PECEP tracks theoretical entropy bounds as data grows and that neural predictors can recover meaningful complexity ordering, offering a practical approach for comparing temporal dynamics in real-world, high-dimensional time series.
Abstract
Conditional differential entropy provides an intuitive measure for relatively ranking time-series complexity by quantifying uncertainty in future observations given past context. However, its direct computation for high-dimensional processes from unknown distributions is often intractable. This paper builds on the information theoretic prediction error bounds established by Fang et al. \cite{fang2019generic}, which demonstrate that the conditional differential entropy \textbf{$h(X_k \mid X_{k-1},...,X_{k-m})$} is upper bounded by a function of the determinant of the covariance matrix of next-step prediction errors for any next step prediction model. We add to this theoretical framework by further increasing this bound by leveraging Hadamard's inequality and the positive semi-definite property of covariance matrices. To see if these bounds can be used to rank the complexity of time series, we conducted two synthetic experiments: (1) controlled linear autoregressive processes with additive Gaussian noise, where we compare ordinary least squares prediction error entropy proxies to the true entropies of various additive noises, and (2) a complexity ranking task of bio-inspired synthetic audio data with unknown entropy, where neural network prediction errors are used to recover the known complexity ordering. This framework provides a computationally tractable method for time-series complexity ranking using prediction errors from next-step prediction models, that maintains a theoretical foundation in information theory.
