Reliable and Reproducible Demographic Inference for Fairness in Face Analysis
Alexandre Fournier-Montgieux, Hervé Le Borgne, Adrian Popescu, Bertrand Luvison
TL;DR
This work tackles the reliability gap in demographic attribute inference (DAI) for fairness auditing in face analysis systems by proposing a modular transfer-learning pipeline that freezes pretrained face recognition backbones and trains non-linear classification heads. The authors introduce a taxonomy-agnostic robustness metric, HomE, to capture intra-identity label consistency and provide a theoretical framework showing that improved DAI accuracy reduces bias and variance in downstream fairness estimates. Empirical results across ethnicity and gender inference show substantial improvements in accuracy, fairness, and robustness, with ethnicity benefiting most from the approach, and larger backbones providing additional gains. The study emphasizes transparency and reproducibility by committing to public release of data processing scripts, models, and evaluation tools, and discusses ethical considerations, limitations, and future directions for finer-grained segmentation and interpretability. Overall, the paper establishes a practical, scalable foundation for reliable fairness auditing in face analysis through a reproducible DAI paradigm and rigorous robustness assessment.
Abstract
Fairness evaluation in face analysis systems (FAS) typically depends on automatic demographic attribute inference (DAI), which itself relies on predefined demographic segmentation. However, the validity of fairness auditing hinges on the reliability of the DAI process. We begin by providing a theoretical motivation for this dependency, showing that improved DAI reliability leads to less biased and lower-variance estimates of FAS fairness. To address this, we propose a fully reproducible DAI pipeline that replaces conventional end-to-end training with a modular transfer learning approach. Our design integrates pretrained face recognition encoders with non-linear classification heads. We audit this pipeline across three dimensions: accuracy, fairness, and a newly introduced notion of robustness, defined via intra-identity consistency. The proposed robustness metric is applicable to any demographic segmentation scheme. We benchmark the pipeline on gender and ethnicity inference across multiple datasets and training setups. Our results show that the proposed method outperforms strong baselines, particularly on ethnicity, which is the more challenging attribute. To promote transparency and reproducibility, we will publicly release the training dataset metadata, full codebase, pretrained models, and evaluation toolkit. This work contributes a reliable foundation for demographic inference in fairness auditing.
