Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Temperley-Lieb integrable models and fusion categories

Matthew Blakeney, Luke Corcoran, Marius de Leeuw, Balazs Pozsgay, Eric Vernier

Abstract

We show that every fusion category containing a non-invertible, self-dual object $a$ gives rise to an integrable anyonic chain whose Hamiltonian density satisfies the Temperley-Lieb algebra. This spin chain arises by considering the projection onto the identity channel in the fusion process $a\otimes a$. We relate these models to Pasquier's construction of ADE lattice models. We then exploit the underlying Temperley-Lieb structure to discuss the spectrum of these models and argue that these models are gapped when the quantum dimension of $a$ is greater than 2. We show that for fusion categories where the dimension is close to 2, such as the Fib$\times$Fib and Haagerup fusion categories, the finite size effects are large and they can obscure the numerical analysis of the gap.

Temperley-Lieb integrable models and fusion categories

Abstract

We show that every fusion category containing a non-invertible, self-dual object gives rise to an integrable anyonic chain whose Hamiltonian density satisfies the Temperley-Lieb algebra. This spin chain arises by considering the projection onto the identity channel in the fusion process . We relate these models to Pasquier's construction of ADE lattice models. We then exploit the underlying Temperley-Lieb structure to discuss the spectrum of these models and argue that these models are gapped when the quantum dimension of is greater than 2. We show that for fusion categories where the dimension is close to 2, such as the FibFib and Haagerup fusion categories, the finite size effects are large and they can obscure the numerical analysis of the gap.
Paper Structure (24 sections, 71 equations, 3 figures)

This paper contains 24 sections, 71 equations, 3 figures.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: Spectra of the Hamiltonian for the Fib$\times$Fib (left) and Haagerup (right) chains for $L=4,6,8$. We have indicated in blue (resp. yellow, green) the energy levels that can be recovered from the XXZ chain at zero magnetization and twists $\varphi_0$ (resp. $\varphi_1$, $\varphi_2$) as defined in the main text, see eqs \ref{['twistsFF']} and \ref{['twistsH']}. The remaining energy levels, marked in gray, are recovered by XXZ sectors with nonzero values of the magnetization.
  • Figure 2: Low-lying spectra of the Fib$\times$Fib (top) and Haagerup chains (bottom) for increasing system sizes: numerical data (obtained form exact diagonalization for $L$ up to $8$, and from DMRG for $L$ between $10$ and $20$) is shown as black dots, and the blue/orange dotted lines show the lowest energies $E_0(L)$ and $E_1(L)$ in the sectors $(0,\varphi_0)$ and $(0,\varphi_1)$, computed by Bethe ansatz.
  • Figure 3: The rescaled gap $- \frac{\log(E_1(L)-E_0(L))}{L/\xi}$ between the ground states of the $(0,\varphi_0)$ and $(0,\varphi_1)$ sectors, as a function of $\Delta$. The red to yellow lines show data from Bethe ansatz for increasing system sizes, where we used larger plot marks to evidence the Fib$\times$Fib and Haagerup points. The blue line gives the value of the correlation length $\xi$ as a function of $\Delta$.