The richest clusters in the Coma and Leo superclusters: Properties and evolution
Maret Einasto, Peeter Tenjes, Rain Kipper, Pekka Heinämäki, Elmo Tempel, Lauri Juhan Liivamägi, Michael J. West, Boris Deshev, Jaan Einasto
TL;DR
The paper investigates the richest clusters in the Coma and Leo superclusters (A1656, A1367, A1185) to illuminate their growth from turnaround to virialisation using PPS, a spherical-collapse framework, and multi-wavelength data from SDSS DR10 and DESI. Substructure is quantified with Gaussian mixture modeling, while cluster connectivity is assessed via Bisous filaments; galaxy content is analyzed across clusters, their regions of influence, and surrounding large-scale environments. The study finds persistent substructure and multiple filaments around all three clusters, with regions of influence at $R_{inf}\approx 4\,h^{-1}$ Mpc and density contrast at the border $\Delta\rho_{inf}\approx 50$–60, turnaround at $z_{ta}\approx 0.4$–0.5, and virialisation in about $3.3$ Gyr; supercluster regions are predicted to virialise in ~10 Gyr and are unlikely to merge. Tight scaling relations link cluster masses to masses embedded in their regions of influence and turnaround ($M_{inf} \approx 1.6 M_{cl} + 0.2$, $M_{ta} \approx 2.2 M_{cl} + 0.3$), suggesting self-similar mass distribution even as cluster properties vary widely due to different evolutionary histories. The results underscore substantial diversity in cluster assembly and environment-driven galaxy evolution, and they motivate larger, joint observational-simulation studies to map cluster growth across cosmic time.
Abstract
We study the substructure, connectivity, and galaxy content of galaxy clusters A1656 and 1367 in the Coma supercluster and of A1185 in the Leo supercluster with the aim of understanding the evolution of clusters from turnaround to virialisation. We used data from the SDSS DR10 MAIN galaxy sample and from DESI cluster catalogues. The projected phase space diagram and the distribution of mass were used to identify regions of various infall stages (early and late infall, and regions of ongoing infall, i.e. regions of influence), their characteristic radii, embedded mass, and density contrasts in order to study the evolution of clusters with the spherical collapse model. We determined the substructure of clusters using normal mixture modelling and their connectivity by counting filaments in the cluster's regions of influence, analysed galaxy content of clusters, and derived scaling relations between cluster masses. All three clusters have a substructure with two to five components and up to six filaments connected to them. The radii of regions of influence are $R_\mathrm{inf} \approx 4$ Mpc, and the density contrast at their borders is $Δρ_{inf} \approx 50 - 60$. The scaling relations between the masses of clusters have a very small scatter. The galaxy content of the clusters and of their regions of influence vary from cluster to cluster. In superclusters the percentage of quiescent galaxies is higher than in low-density regions between superclusters. The collapse of the regions of influence of clusters started at redshifts $z \approx 0.4 - 0.5$. Clusters will be virialised in $\approx 3.3$ Gyrs. Clusters in superclusters will not merge, and their present-day turnaround regions will be virialised in $\approx 10$ Gyrs. The large variety of properties of clusters suggests that they have followed different paths during evolution.
