Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Linking Magnetic Field Diagnostics with 3D CME Speeds in Solar Active Regions

Harshita Gandhi, Huw Morgan

TL;DR

This paper investigates how pre-eruption magnetic diagnostics relate to 3D CME speeds by comparing two Green’s-function potential-field extrapolation approaches: PIL-based and PIL-centered ROI-based. It demonstrates that the critical height $h_{ m crit}$, derived from decay-index profiles, is the strongest predictor of CME speed, with ROI-weighted $h_{ m crit}$ achieving correlations around $r\approx0.73$ for slower CMEs, and PIL-based $h_{ m crit}$ yielding similar performance. The mean transverse field $B_t$ at coronal heights contributes weakly on its own, while the product $B_t\times R_f$ related to ribbon flux modestly improves multi-parameter fits to $r_p\approx0.76$ when combined with $h_{ m crit}$. Overall, $h_{ m crit}$ emerges as the primary, robust predictor of CME speed across methods, with ROI-based diagnostics offering a scalable path toward automated space-weather forecasting that mirrors PIL-tracking results.

Abstract

Understanding how active-region properties influence coronal mass ejection (CME) dynamics is essential for constraining eruption models and improving space-weather prediction. Magnetic diagnostics derived above polarity inversion lines (PILs), including the critical height ($h_{\rm crit}$) of torus instability onset, the overlying field strength ($B_{\rm t}$), and ribbon flux ($R_{\rm f}$), provide physically motivated measures of eruption onset. The two main aims of this work are to (i) show that $h_{\rm crit}$ and $B_{\rm t}$ can equally well predict CME speeds when evaluated over the region of interest (ROI) not directly above the PIL, and (ii) assess the value of $h_{\rm crit}$, $B_{\rm t}$ and $R_{\rm f}$ in predicting CME speed. Photospheric magnetograms are modeled with potential-field extrapolations to obtain decay index profiles. Critical heights above PILs correlate strongly with 3D CME speed ($r = 0.71$). Using ROIs of $\approx$ 1.8, 3.7, and 7.3 Mm), centered on the PIL, weighted $h_{\rm crit}$ from the 7.3x7.3 ROI provides the strongest correlation ($r = 0.73$), while mean $B_{\rm t}$ at 150 Mm is weaker ($r = 0.33$). Combining both offers little improvement ($r = 0.74$), confirming $h_{\rm crit}$ as the dominant predictor. CME speed correlates moderately with $B_{\rm t} \times R_{\rm f}$ ($r = 0.44$), and highest when combined with $h_{\rm crit}$ ($r = 0.76$). Thus, in potential field models, ROI-based critical heights are as predictive as those above the PIL, indicating that the broader active-region field structure is equally valid as a diagnostic. When all parameters are considered together, $h_{\rm crit}$ alone consistently shows the highest predictive power for CME speed.

Linking Magnetic Field Diagnostics with 3D CME Speeds in Solar Active Regions

TL;DR

This paper investigates how pre-eruption magnetic diagnostics relate to 3D CME speeds by comparing two Green’s-function potential-field extrapolation approaches: PIL-based and PIL-centered ROI-based. It demonstrates that the critical height , derived from decay-index profiles, is the strongest predictor of CME speed, with ROI-weighted achieving correlations around for slower CMEs, and PIL-based yielding similar performance. The mean transverse field at coronal heights contributes weakly on its own, while the product related to ribbon flux modestly improves multi-parameter fits to when combined with . Overall, emerges as the primary, robust predictor of CME speed across methods, with ROI-based diagnostics offering a scalable path toward automated space-weather forecasting that mirrors PIL-tracking results.

Abstract

Understanding how active-region properties influence coronal mass ejection (CME) dynamics is essential for constraining eruption models and improving space-weather prediction. Magnetic diagnostics derived above polarity inversion lines (PILs), including the critical height () of torus instability onset, the overlying field strength (), and ribbon flux (), provide physically motivated measures of eruption onset. The two main aims of this work are to (i) show that and can equally well predict CME speeds when evaluated over the region of interest (ROI) not directly above the PIL, and (ii) assess the value of , and in predicting CME speed. Photospheric magnetograms are modeled with potential-field extrapolations to obtain decay index profiles. Critical heights above PILs correlate strongly with 3D CME speed (). Using ROIs of 1.8, 3.7, and 7.3 Mm), centered on the PIL, weighted from the 7.3x7.3 ROI provides the strongest correlation (), while mean at 150 Mm is weaker (). Combining both offers little improvement (), confirming as the dominant predictor. CME speed correlates moderately with (), and highest when combined with (). Thus, in potential field models, ROI-based critical heights are as predictive as those above the PIL, indicating that the broader active-region field structure is equally valid as a diagnostic. When all parameters are considered together, alone consistently shows the highest predictive power for CME speed.
Paper Structure (11 sections, 13 equations, 11 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 11 sections, 13 equations, 11 figures, 1 table.

Figures (11)

  • Figure 1: Full disk line-of-sight magnetogram observed by HMI onboard SDO on 2017 September 4 at 19:48:42 UT with zoomed in cutout of the active region used for the application of the extrapolation method.
  • Figure 2: Potential-field extrapolation for one of the studied active regions. The background shows the radial photospheric field from HMI, and coloured curves are traced field lines.
  • Figure 3: Figure shows HMI $B_r$ cutouts with the longest detected PIL overplotted in red. The temporal sequence shows how the PIL is tracked across magnetograms over time.
  • Figure 4: (a) Mean decay index profile along the PIL as a function of height.(b) Temporal evolution of the critical height, with red and blue dashed lines marking CME onset time and the first appearance time in SOHO/LASCO-C2
  • Figure 5: Photospheric $B_z$ map with polarity inversion line (PIL, yellow) and overlaid regions of interest (ROIs): 5×5 pixels (blue), 10×10 pixels (green), and 20×20 pixels (red).
  • ...and 6 more figures