UNO-Bench: A Unified Benchmark for Exploring the Compositional Law Between Uni-modal and Omni-modal in Omni Models
Chen Chen, ZeYang Hu, Fengjiao Chen, Liya Ma, Jiaxing Liu, Xiaoyu Li, Ziwen Wang, Xuezhi Cao, Xunliang Cai
TL;DR
UNO-Bench introduces a unified Omni-model benchmark that simultaneously evaluates uni-modal and omni-modal capabilities across 44 task types and 5 modality combinations. It couples a human-curated omni-modal dataset with enhanced uni-modal data, a novel Multi-Step Open-Ended Question format, and a general scoring model to enable automated, scalable evaluation. The core finding is a multiplicative Compositional Law, $P_{Omni} = C \cdot (P_{A} \cdot P_{V})^{\alpha} + b$, with $\alpha \approx 2.19$, $C \approx 1.03$, and $b \approx 0.24$, indicating strong power-law synergy and emergent omni-modal capabilities as uni-modal foundations improve. Experiments reveal omni-modal bottlenecks on weaker models but pronounced synergy on stronger models, with Gemini-2.5-Pro approaching human-like perception yet lagging in reasoning, highlighting the need to advance cross-modal reasoning. The benchmark also demonstrates high data quality and evaluation efficiency via clustering-based compression (CGHS) and supports future expansion to harder tasks and more modalities.
Abstract
Multimodal Large Languages models have been progressing from uni-modal understanding toward unifying visual, audio and language modalities, collectively termed omni models. However, the correlation between uni-modal and omni-modal remains unclear, which requires comprehensive evaluation to drive omni model's intelligence evolution. In this work, we introduce a novel, high-quality, and UNified Omni model benchmark, UNO-Bench. This benchmark is designed to effectively evaluate both UNi-modal and Omni-modal capabilities under a unified ability taxonomy, spanning 44 task types and 5 modality combinations. It includes 1250 human curated samples for omni-modal with 98% cross-modality solvability, and 2480 enhanced uni-modal samples. The human-generated dataset is well-suited to real-world scenarios, particularly within the Chinese context, whereas the automatically compressed dataset offers a 90% increase in speed and maintains 98% consistency across 18 public benchmarks. In addition to traditional multi-choice questions, we propose an innovative multi-step open-ended question format to assess complex reasoning. A general scoring model is incorporated, supporting 6 question types for automated evaluation with 95% accuracy. Experimental result shows the Compositional Law between omni-modal and uni-modal performance and the omni-modal capability manifests as a bottleneck effect on weak models, while exhibiting synergistic promotion on strong models.
