Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Uncertainty Estimation by Flexible Evidential Deep Learning

Taeseong Yoon, Heeyoung Kim

TL;DR

Uncertainty Estimation by Flexible Evidential Deep Learning introduces $\mathcal{F}$-EDL, which extends Evidential Deep Learning by predicting a flexible Dirichlet distribution $FD^{K}(\alpha, p, \tau)$ over class probabilities to capture multimodal and input-dependent uncertainty. The approach derives a three-headed architecture that outputs $\alpha$, $p$, and $\tau$, with an objective that combines an expected MSE under $FD$ and a calibration term, enabling analytic training without sampling. Theoretical results establish conjugacy of the $FD$ prior, a Bayesian interpretation with input-dependent priors, and the reduction to standard EDL as a special case, along with multimodality and a mixture-decomposition of predictive uncertainty framed in a subjective-logic view. Empirically, $\mathcal{F}$-EDL achieves state-of-the-art UQ across classical, long-tailed, and noisy in-distribution settings and exhibits interpretable multimodal uncertainty and faithful epistemic behavior, while maintaining single-pass efficiency. The work positions $FD$-based uncertainty as a principled, scalable alternative to Dirichlet-only EDL for robust downstream uncertainty quantification.

Abstract

Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is crucial for deploying machine learning models in high-stakes applications, where overconfident predictions can lead to serious consequences. An effective UQ method must balance computational efficiency with the ability to generalize across diverse scenarios. Evidential deep learning (EDL) achieves efficiency by modeling uncertainty through the prediction of a Dirichlet distribution over class probabilities. However, the restrictive assumption of Dirichlet-distributed class probabilities limits EDL's robustness, particularly in complex or unforeseen situations. To address this, we propose \textit{flexible evidential deep learning} ($\mathcal{F}$-EDL), which extends EDL by predicting a flexible Dirichlet distribution -- a generalization of the Dirichlet distribution -- over class probabilities. This approach provides a more expressive and adaptive representation of uncertainty, significantly enhancing UQ generalization and reliability under challenging scenarios. We theoretically establish several advantages of $\mathcal{F}$-EDL and empirically demonstrate its state-of-the-art UQ performance across diverse evaluation settings, including classical, long-tailed, and noisy in-distribution scenarios.

Uncertainty Estimation by Flexible Evidential Deep Learning

TL;DR

Uncertainty Estimation by Flexible Evidential Deep Learning introduces -EDL, which extends Evidential Deep Learning by predicting a flexible Dirichlet distribution over class probabilities to capture multimodal and input-dependent uncertainty. The approach derives a three-headed architecture that outputs , , and , with an objective that combines an expected MSE under and a calibration term, enabling analytic training without sampling. Theoretical results establish conjugacy of the prior, a Bayesian interpretation with input-dependent priors, and the reduction to standard EDL as a special case, along with multimodality and a mixture-decomposition of predictive uncertainty framed in a subjective-logic view. Empirically, -EDL achieves state-of-the-art UQ across classical, long-tailed, and noisy in-distribution settings and exhibits interpretable multimodal uncertainty and faithful epistemic behavior, while maintaining single-pass efficiency. The work positions -based uncertainty as a principled, scalable alternative to Dirichlet-only EDL for robust downstream uncertainty quantification.

Abstract

Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is crucial for deploying machine learning models in high-stakes applications, where overconfident predictions can lead to serious consequences. An effective UQ method must balance computational efficiency with the ability to generalize across diverse scenarios. Evidential deep learning (EDL) achieves efficiency by modeling uncertainty through the prediction of a Dirichlet distribution over class probabilities. However, the restrictive assumption of Dirichlet-distributed class probabilities limits EDL's robustness, particularly in complex or unforeseen situations. To address this, we propose \textit{flexible evidential deep learning} (-EDL), which extends EDL by predicting a flexible Dirichlet distribution -- a generalization of the Dirichlet distribution -- over class probabilities. This approach provides a more expressive and adaptive representation of uncertainty, significantly enhancing UQ generalization and reliability under challenging scenarios. We theoretically establish several advantages of -EDL and empirically demonstrate its state-of-the-art UQ performance across diverse evaluation settings, including classical, long-tailed, and noisy in-distribution scenarios.
Paper Structure (58 sections, 7 theorems, 73 equations, 7 figures, 16 tables, 2 algorithms)

This paper contains 58 sections, 7 theorems, 73 equations, 7 figures, 16 tables, 2 algorithms.

Key Result

Lemma 4.1

(Conjugacy of FD Prior) Let $y_{i} \sim \operatorname{Cat}(\boldsymbol{\pi}), \forall i \in [N]$, where $\boldsymbol{\pi} \sim \operatorname{FD}(\boldsymbol{\alpha}, \mathbf{p}, \tau)$. The posterior distribution of $\boldsymbol{\pi}$ given $\{y_{i}\}_{i=1}^{N}$ is also an FD distribution, $\boldsym

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: Epistemic uncertainty distributions with DMNIST as the ID dataset. The top row presents sample images from three datasets: MNIST, AMNIST, and FMNIST. Panels (a) and (b) display histograms depicting the epistemic uncertainty distributions obtained by the EDL and $\mathcal{F}$-EDL (proposed) models, respectively, across these datasets.
  • Figure 2: (a) Graphical model and (b) generative process of the proposed $\mathcal{F}$-EDL framework.
  • Figure 3: Posterior class probability distributions for a DMNIST input (true label: 9), which is visually ambiguous and resembles class 7. The leftmost panel shows the input image. The second and third panels display the marginal distributions of the two most probable classes predicted by EDL (denoted as $\pi_{k}$ for class $k$), while the fourth and fifth panels show those predicted by $\mathcal{F}$-EDL.
  • Figure 4: UQ-related downstream task results are reported using the DMNIST dataset as the ID dataset. "FMNIST" denotes AUPR scores for OOD detection based on epistemic uncertainty, with FMNIST as the OOD dataset.
  • Figure 4: Test accuracy (blue, solid line) and epistemic uncertainty (red, dashed line) of EDL (left), DAEDL (middle), and $\mathcal{F}$-EDL (right) across increasing training set sizes: {500, 1000, 2000, 5000, 10000, 25000, 50000}. Accuracy is plotted on the left y-axis, and uncertainty is plotted on the right y-axis in each subplot.
  • ...and 2 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (7)

  • Lemma 4.1
  • Theorem 4.2
  • Theorem 4.3
  • Theorem 4.4
  • Theorem 4.5
  • Proposition 4.6
  • Theorem C.1