Table of Contents
Fetching ...

R2L: Reliable Reinforcement Learning: Guaranteed Return & Reliable Policies in Reinforcement Learning

Nadir Farhi

TL;DR

This work tackles the need for reliability in reinforcement learning by maximizing the probability that cumulative return exceeds a threshold, rather than maximizing expected return. It proposes a state-augmented MDP where the remaining required return is added to the state, transforming the reliable objective into a standard RL problem solvable by existing algorithms, with theoretical equivalence guarantees. The framework is instantiated in reliable routing, formulating a Stochastic On-Time Arrival problem and demonstrating both discrete (Reliable Q-learning) and deep RL (Reliable D3QN) solutions that balance efficiency and reliability. The approach offers practical risk- and safety-aware decision making for stochastic and potentially safety-critical domains, while highlighting trade-offs between higher reliability and achievable return and outlining paths for future scalability and extension to partially known environments.

Abstract

In this work, we address the problem of determining reliable policies in reinforcement learning (RL), with a focus on optimization under uncertainty and the need for performance guarantees. While classical RL algorithms aim at maximizing the expected return, many real-world applications - such as routing, resource allocation, or sequential decision-making under risk - require strategies that ensure not only high average performance but also a guaranteed probability of success. To this end, we propose a novel formulation in which the objective is to maximize the probability that the cumulative return exceeds a prescribed threshold. We demonstrate that this reliable RL problem can be reformulated, via a state-augmented representation, into a standard RL problem, thereby allowing the use of existing RL and deep RL algorithms without the need for entirely new algorithmic frameworks. Theoretical results establish the equivalence of the two formulations and show that reliable strategies can be derived by appropriately adapting well-known methods such as Q-learning or Dueling Double DQN. To illustrate the practical relevance of the approach, we consider the problem of reliable routing, where the goal is not to minimize the expected travel time but rather to maximize the probability of reaching the destination within a given time budget. Numerical experiments confirm that the proposed formulation leads to policies that effectively balance efficiency and reliability, highlighting the potential of reliable RL for applications in stochastic and safety-critical environments.

R2L: Reliable Reinforcement Learning: Guaranteed Return & Reliable Policies in Reinforcement Learning

TL;DR

This work tackles the need for reliability in reinforcement learning by maximizing the probability that cumulative return exceeds a threshold, rather than maximizing expected return. It proposes a state-augmented MDP where the remaining required return is added to the state, transforming the reliable objective into a standard RL problem solvable by existing algorithms, with theoretical equivalence guarantees. The framework is instantiated in reliable routing, formulating a Stochastic On-Time Arrival problem and demonstrating both discrete (Reliable Q-learning) and deep RL (Reliable D3QN) solutions that balance efficiency and reliability. The approach offers practical risk- and safety-aware decision making for stochastic and potentially safety-critical domains, while highlighting trade-offs between higher reliability and achievable return and outlining paths for future scalability and extension to partially known environments.

Abstract

In this work, we address the problem of determining reliable policies in reinforcement learning (RL), with a focus on optimization under uncertainty and the need for performance guarantees. While classical RL algorithms aim at maximizing the expected return, many real-world applications - such as routing, resource allocation, or sequential decision-making under risk - require strategies that ensure not only high average performance but also a guaranteed probability of success. To this end, we propose a novel formulation in which the objective is to maximize the probability that the cumulative return exceeds a prescribed threshold. We demonstrate that this reliable RL problem can be reformulated, via a state-augmented representation, into a standard RL problem, thereby allowing the use of existing RL and deep RL algorithms without the need for entirely new algorithmic frameworks. Theoretical results establish the equivalence of the two formulations and show that reliable strategies can be derived by appropriately adapting well-known methods such as Q-learning or Dueling Double DQN. To illustrate the practical relevance of the approach, we consider the problem of reliable routing, where the goal is not to minimize the expected travel time but rather to maximize the probability of reaching the destination within a given time budget. Numerical experiments confirm that the proposed formulation leads to policies that effectively balance efficiency and reliability, highlighting the potential of reliable RL for applications in stochastic and safety-critical environments.
Paper Structure (16 sections, 2 theorems, 27 equations, 9 figures, 3 tables, 3 algorithms)

This paper contains 16 sections, 2 theorems, 27 equations, 9 figures, 3 tables, 3 algorithms.

Key Result

Proposition 4.1

In the state-augmented formulation, the Bellman equation of the optimization problem (pbm2) under the dynamics (dyn2), is given by Eq. (eq:qtilde)-(eq:terminal).

Figures (9)

  • Figure 1: Comparison between standard RL (maximizing expected return) and reliable RL (maximizing the probability of exceeding a threshold).
  • Figure 2: The price of reliability.
  • Figure 3: A non directed 5x5 grid network with orgin node 0 and destination node 24.
  • Figure 4: Illustration of the convergence of the reliable Q-learning algorithm for reliable routing.
  • Figure 5: Optimal probabilities and optimal policies for the routing problem.
  • ...and 4 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (2)

  • Proposition 4.1
  • Proposition 4.2