Measure-Theoretic Anti-Causal Representation Learning
Arman Behnam, Binghui Wang
TL;DR
This work introduces ACIA, a measure-theoretic framework for anti-causal representation learning that learns low-level causal dynamics and high-level environment-invariant abstractions through interventional kernels. By formulating learning as a min–max optimization with environment-independence and causal-structure regularizers, ACIA achieves strong out-of-distribution generalization across diverse environments and interventions. The approach is grounded in a product causal space with causal and interventional kernels, and it provides convergence and generalization guarantees. Empirically, ACIA outperforms strong baselines on synthetic anti-causal datasets (CMNIST, RMNIST, Ball Agent) and a real medical dataset (Camelyon17), demonstrating robust invariance to environmental variations and interventions. These results indicate that measure-theoretic anti-causal representations can enhance robustness and transferability in domains where causal directions are inverted and interventions are imperfect.
Abstract
Causal representation learning in the anti-causal setting (labels cause features rather than the reverse) presents unique challenges requiring specialized approaches. We propose Anti-Causal Invariant Abstractions (ACIA), a novel measure-theoretic framework for anti-causal representation learning. ACIA employs a two-level design, low-level representations capture how labels generate observations, while high-level representations learn stable causal patterns across environment-specific variations. ACIA addresses key limitations of existing approaches by accommodating prefect and imperfect interventions through interventional kernels, eliminating dependency on explicit causal structures, handling high-dimensional data effectively, and providing theoretical guarantees for out-of-distribution generalization. Experiments on synthetic and real-world medical datasets demonstrate that ACIA consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods in both accuracy and invariance metrics. Furthermore, our theoretical results establish tight bounds on performance gaps between training and unseen environments, confirming the efficacy of our approach for robust anti-causal learning.
