Table of Contents
Fetching ...

MIRAGE: Agentic Framework for Multimodal Misinformation Detection with Web-Grounded Reasoning

Mir Nafis Sharear Shopnil, Sharad Duwal, Abhishek Tyagi, Adiba Mahbub Proma

TL;DR

MIRAGE tackles multimodal misinformation by decomposing verification into four dedicated, model-pluggable modules that separately assess visual authenticity, cross-modal alignment, and retrieval-augmented factual claims, before a calibrated final judgment combines signals with citation-backed rationales. The framework uses external web retrieval to ground claims and outputs transparent JSON evidence, enabling auditing and potential human-in-the-loop workflows. On MMFakeBench, MIRAGE achieves the strongest reported F1 (81.65% on validation) and demonstrates generalization to a 5k test set (81.44% F1), with ablations pinpointing the contributions of visual verification and retrieval-based reasoning. The approach avoids domain-specific training, offering a scalable, interpretable, and cost-conscious path to misinformation detection across modalities where labeled data are scarce, while acknowledging limitations related to niche topics, high-fidelity AI imagery, and deployment costs.

Abstract

Misinformation spreads across web platforms through billions of daily multimodal posts that combine text and images, overwhelming manual fact-checking capacity. Supervised detection models require domain-specific training data and fail to generalize across diverse manipulation tactics. We present MIRAGE, an inference-time, model-pluggable agentic framework that decomposes multimodal verification into four sequential modules: visual veracity assessment detects AI-generated images, cross-modal consistency analysis identifies out-of-context repurposing, retrieval-augmented factual checking grounds claims in web evidence through iterative question generation, and a calibrated judgment module integrates all signals. MIRAGE orchestrates vision-language model reasoning with targeted web retrieval, outputs structured and citation-linked rationales. On MMFakeBench validation set (1,000 samples), MIRAGE with GPT-4o-mini achieves 81.65% F1 and 75.1% accuracy, outperforming the strongest zero-shot baseline (GPT-4V with MMD-Agent at 74.0% F1) by 7.65 points while maintaining 34.3% false positive rate versus 97.3% for a judge-only baseline. Test set results (5,000 samples) confirm generalization with 81.44% F1 and 75.08% accuracy. Ablation studies show visual verification contributes 5.18 F1 points and retrieval-augmented reasoning contributes 2.97 points. Our results demonstrate that decomposed agentic reasoning with web retrieval can match supervised detector performance without domain-specific training, enabling misinformation detection across modalities where labeled data remains scarce.

MIRAGE: Agentic Framework for Multimodal Misinformation Detection with Web-Grounded Reasoning

TL;DR

MIRAGE tackles multimodal misinformation by decomposing verification into four dedicated, model-pluggable modules that separately assess visual authenticity, cross-modal alignment, and retrieval-augmented factual claims, before a calibrated final judgment combines signals with citation-backed rationales. The framework uses external web retrieval to ground claims and outputs transparent JSON evidence, enabling auditing and potential human-in-the-loop workflows. On MMFakeBench, MIRAGE achieves the strongest reported F1 (81.65% on validation) and demonstrates generalization to a 5k test set (81.44% F1), with ablations pinpointing the contributions of visual verification and retrieval-based reasoning. The approach avoids domain-specific training, offering a scalable, interpretable, and cost-conscious path to misinformation detection across modalities where labeled data are scarce, while acknowledging limitations related to niche topics, high-fidelity AI imagery, and deployment costs.

Abstract

Misinformation spreads across web platforms through billions of daily multimodal posts that combine text and images, overwhelming manual fact-checking capacity. Supervised detection models require domain-specific training data and fail to generalize across diverse manipulation tactics. We present MIRAGE, an inference-time, model-pluggable agentic framework that decomposes multimodal verification into four sequential modules: visual veracity assessment detects AI-generated images, cross-modal consistency analysis identifies out-of-context repurposing, retrieval-augmented factual checking grounds claims in web evidence through iterative question generation, and a calibrated judgment module integrates all signals. MIRAGE orchestrates vision-language model reasoning with targeted web retrieval, outputs structured and citation-linked rationales. On MMFakeBench validation set (1,000 samples), MIRAGE with GPT-4o-mini achieves 81.65% F1 and 75.1% accuracy, outperforming the strongest zero-shot baseline (GPT-4V with MMD-Agent at 74.0% F1) by 7.65 points while maintaining 34.3% false positive rate versus 97.3% for a judge-only baseline. Test set results (5,000 samples) confirm generalization with 81.44% F1 and 75.08% accuracy. Ablation studies show visual verification contributes 5.18 F1 points and retrieval-augmented reasoning contributes 2.97 points. Our results demonstrate that decomposed agentic reasoning with web retrieval can match supervised detector performance without domain-specific training, enabling misinformation detection across modalities where labeled data remains scarce.
Paper Structure (45 sections, 2 equations, 1 figure, 3 tables)

This paper contains 45 sections, 2 equations, 1 figure, 3 tables.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: MIRAGE architecture showing the four sequential modules: Visual Verification analyzes images for AI generation and manipulation, Relevancy Assessment evaluates cross-modal alignment, Claim Verification performs retrieval-augmented fact-checking, and Final Judgment integrates all signals to produce calibrated predictions.