A four-dimensional body of constant width
Marcela G. Mercado-Flores, Miguel Raggi, Edgardo Roldán-Pensado
TL;DR
The paper constructs a four-dimensional body of constant width by modifying a unit $4$-dimensional Reuleaux simplex $\mathcal{R}$ via a distinguished subset $\mathcal{M}_0$ of its 2-skeleton, yielding $\mathcal{M}=\bigcap_{P\in\mathcal{M}_0}\mathcal{B}(P,1)$ with tetrahedral symmetry. It proves $\mathcal{M}$ has constant width by establishing that $\operatorname{diam}(\mathcal{M}_0)=1$, every boundary point outside $\mathcal{M}_0$ has a unique antipodal point in $\mathcal{M}_0$, and that boundary points are smooth away from $\mathcal{M}_0$, enabling the application of Pal’s theorem. The authors also project $\mathcal{M}$ onto the 3D base hyperplane to obtain a novel tetrahedrally symmetric 3D constant-width body $\pi(\mathcal{M})$ with six elliptical edges and a near-meissner-like volume, estimated at about $0.420$, suggesting it may minimize volume among such 3D bodies. The work deepens the understanding of higher-dimensional constant-width bodies and introduces a new 3D shadow with distinctive non-spherical boundary features, broadening the landscape of extremal convex geometry in higher dimensions.
Abstract
The study of bodies of constant width is a classical subject in convex geometry, with the three-dimensional Meissner bodies being canonical examples. This paper presents a novel geometric construction of a body of constant width in $R^4$, addressing the challenge of constructing such bodies in higher dimensions. Our method produces a natural analogue of the second Meissner body, by modifying a 4-dimensional Reuleaux simplex. The resulting body possesses tetrahedral symmetry and has a boundary composed of both smooth surfaces and a non-smooth subset of the Reuleaux 4-simplex. Furthermore, we analyze the orthogonal projection of this body onto the 3-dimensional hyperplane of its base. This "shadow" is a new 3-dimensional body of constant width with tetrahedral symmetry. It has six elliptical edges and we estimate its volume to be only slightly larger than that of the Meissner bodies.
