Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Constrained bilinear optimal control of reactive evolution equations

Zhexian Li, Felipe de Barros, Ketan Savla

TL;DR

This paper proposes a novel optimize-then-discretize framework for computing constrained bilinear optimal control of second-order linear evolution partial differential equations with a reaction term on the half line, where control arises as a time-dependent reaction coefficient and constraints are imposed on the state and control variables.

Abstract

We consider constrained bilinear optimal control of second-order linear evolution partial differential equations (PDEs) with a reaction term on the half line, where control arises as a time-dependent reaction coefficient and constraints are imposed on the state and control variables. These PDEs represent a wide range of physical phenomena in fluid flow, heat, and mass transfer. Existing computational methods for this type of control problems only consider constraints on the control variable and lack global convergence guarantee. In this paper, we propose a novel optimize-then-discretize framework for computing constrained bilinear optimal control with both state and control constraints. Unlike existing methods that derive optimality conditions directly from the PDE constraint, this framework first replaces the PDE constraint with an equivalent integral representation of the PDE solution and then derives optimality conditions for the reformulated problem. The integral representation, derived from the unified transform method, does not involve differential operators, and thus explicit expressions for necessary conditions of optimality can be derived using the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions for infinite-dimensional optimization. Discretizing the optimality conditions results in a system of finite-dimensional smooth nonlinear equations, which can be efficiently solved using existing algorithms with guaranteed global convergence at a quadratic rate. This is in contrast with discretize-then-optimize methods that discretize the PDE first and then solve the optimality conditions of the approximated finite-dimensional problem. Computational results for two applications, namely nuclear reactivity control and water quality treatment in a reactor, are presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework.

Constrained bilinear optimal control of reactive evolution equations

TL;DR

This paper proposes a novel optimize-then-discretize framework for computing constrained bilinear optimal control of second-order linear evolution partial differential equations with a reaction term on the half line, where control arises as a time-dependent reaction coefficient and constraints are imposed on the state and control variables.

Abstract

We consider constrained bilinear optimal control of second-order linear evolution partial differential equations (PDEs) with a reaction term on the half line, where control arises as a time-dependent reaction coefficient and constraints are imposed on the state and control variables. These PDEs represent a wide range of physical phenomena in fluid flow, heat, and mass transfer. Existing computational methods for this type of control problems only consider constraints on the control variable and lack global convergence guarantee. In this paper, we propose a novel optimize-then-discretize framework for computing constrained bilinear optimal control with both state and control constraints. Unlike existing methods that derive optimality conditions directly from the PDE constraint, this framework first replaces the PDE constraint with an equivalent integral representation of the PDE solution and then derives optimality conditions for the reformulated problem. The integral representation, derived from the unified transform method, does not involve differential operators, and thus explicit expressions for necessary conditions of optimality can be derived using the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions for infinite-dimensional optimization. Discretizing the optimality conditions results in a system of finite-dimensional smooth nonlinear equations, which can be efficiently solved using existing algorithms with guaranteed global convergence at a quadratic rate. This is in contrast with discretize-then-optimize methods that discretize the PDE first and then solve the optimality conditions of the approximated finite-dimensional problem. Computational results for two applications, namely nuclear reactivity control and water quality treatment in a reactor, are presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework.
Paper Structure (22 sections, 62 equations, 8 figures, 1 algorithm)

This paper contains 22 sections, 62 equations, 8 figures, 1 algorithm.

Figures (8)

  • Figure 1: Illustration of Q-quadratic convergence of fsolve using the Levenberg-Marquardt method for two application problems: nuclear reactivity control in Section \ref{['sec:nuclear-reactor']} and solute transport in fluids in Section \ref{['sec:ADE']}. Following the notation used in Section \ref{['sec:numerical-analysis']}, (a) and (b) show that the sequence generated by fsolve converges to a zero of $\pmb{f}(\pmb{y}_k)$; (c) and (d) show that the convergence rate is Q-quadratic since $\|\pmb{y}_{k+1} - \pmb{y}^*\| / \|\pmb{y}_{k} - \pmb{y}^*\|^2$ remains bounded, where $\pmb{y}^*$ is the converged solution.
  • Figure 2: Comparison between the semi-analytical solution derived from the unified transform method (see \ref{['eq:integral-representation-final-neutron']}) with a fully numerical solution. Dimensionless neutron flux versus dimensionless time (left) and versus dimensionless distance (right).
  • Figure 3: Nuclear reactivity control with constant boundary condition specified in (a). The computed optimal control $\Sigma^*_a(t)$ is shown in (b). The neutron flux $\phi(x,t)$ under optimal control is shown in (c) where $\phi(x,t)\leq 0.5$ is imposed in the region $\Omega_2 = \{x\geq 0.5, 0\leq t\leq 1\}.$ (d) gives minimal $\phi_{\max}$ that is feasible for \ref{['eq:optimal-control-neutron']} for different values of $\Sigma_a^{\max}$.
  • Figure 4: Nuclear reactivity control with time-varying boundary conditions specified in (a) and (b), respectively. The computed optimal control is shown in (c) and (d), respectively. The neutron flux under the computed control is shown in (e) and (f), respectively. The state constraint $\phi(x,t)\leq 0.5$ is imposed in the region $\Omega_2 = \{x\geq 0.5, 0\leq t\leq 1\}.$
  • Figure 5: Comparison between the semi-analytical solution derived from the unified transform method (see \ref{['eq:integral-representation-final-solute']}) with a fully numerical solution. Dimensionless solute concentration versus dimensionless time (left) and versus dimensionless distance (right).
  • ...and 3 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (7)

  • Remark 1
  • Remark 2
  • Remark 3
  • Remark 4
  • Remark 5
  • Remark 6
  • Remark 7