From Universal Approximation Theorem to Tropical Geometry of Multi-Layer Perceptrons
Yi-Shan Chu, Yueh-Cheng Kuo
TL;DR
The paper tackles the problem that classical universal approximation results certify existence but not construction of networks with prescribed geometry. It develops a geometry-aware initializer for purely sigmoidal MLPs by compiling a target planar region into a finite-sum network of sigmoid half-space gates, guided by tropical boundary reasoning. The method yields decision boundaries that align with prescribed shapes at initialization, with training serving mainly for refinement; it also extends to arbitrary planar unions via finite ball covers and to higher dimensions through ball-to-polytope constructions. Empirical studies in 2D demonstrate strong initialization performance on disks and Swiss-roll targets, highlighting the practical potential of shaping inductive bias directly through geometry. Overall, the work bridges the classical UAT framework with tropical boundary reasoning, providing an interpretable, shape-driven initialization strategy for smooth MLPs.
Abstract
We revisit the Universal Approximation Theorem(UAT) through the lens of the tropical geometry of neural networks and introduce a constructive, geometry-aware initialization for sigmoidal multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs). Tropical geometry shows that Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU) networks admit decision functions with a combinatorial structure often described as a tropical rational, namely a difference of tropical polynomials. Focusing on planar binary classification, we design purely sigmoidal MLPs that adhere to the finite-sum format of UAT: a finite linear combination of shifted and scaled sigmoids of affine functions. The resulting models yield decision boundaries that already align with prescribed shapes at initialization and can be refined by standard training if desired. This provides a practical bridge between the tropical perspective and smooth MLPs, enabling interpretable, shape-driven initialization without resorting to ReLU architectures. We focus on the construction and empirical demonstrations in two dimensions; theoretical analysis and higher-dimensional extensions are left for future work.
