Jump Processes with Self-Interactions: Large Deviation Asymptotics
Amarjit Budhiraja, Francesco Coghi
TL;DR
The paper develops a Level 2.5 large deviation principle for self-interacting continuous-time Markov jump processes on a finite state space, where jump rates depend on the occupation measure. It introduces a dynamical, non-convex rate function that generalizes the Donsker–Varadhan functional via a weighted, discounted variational formulation tied to Poisson random measures and stochastic control. A novel time-reversal and rescaling framework is used to derive both Laplace upper and lower bounds, with careful construction of near-optimal controls, nondegeneracy, and continuity properties to establish the lower bound. The results elucidate a multiscale local equilibrium mechanism and yield contractions to the empirical current, offering a rigorous tool for analyzing non-Markovian memory effects in self-interacting systems. The framework is demonstrated through illustrative examples including autochemotaxis-inspired dynamics and congestion-modulated routing, highlighting potential applications in statistical physics and applied probability.
Abstract
We consider a pure jump process $\{X_t\}_{t\ge 0}$ with values in a finite state space $S= \{1, \ldots, d\}$ for which the jump rates at time instant $t$ depend on the occupation measure $L_t \doteq t^{-1} \int_0^t δ_{X_s}\,ds$. Such self-interacting chains arise in many contexts within statistical physics and applied probability. Under appropriate conditions, a large deviation principle is established for the pair $(L_t, R_t)$, as $t \to \infty$, where $R_t$ is the empirical flux process associated with the jump process. We show that the rate function takes a simple form that can be viewed as a dynamical generalization of the classical Donsker and Varadhan rate function for the analogous quantities in the setting of Markov processes, in particular, unlike the Markovian case, the rate function is not convex. Since the state process is non-Markovian, different techniques are needed than in the setting of Donsker and Varadhan and our proofs rely on variational representations for functionals of Poisson random measures and stochastic control methods.
