Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Row-wise Fusion Regularization: An Interpretable Personalized Federated Learning Framework in Large-Scale Scenarios

Runlin Zhou, Letian Li, Zemin Zheng

TL;DR

The paper addresses personalized federated learning for multivariate outcomes under client heterogeneity and cross-variable dependencies. It introduces Sparse Row-wise Fusion (SROF) to cluster coefficient rows across clients while enforcing within-row sparsity, and develops RowFed, a communication-efficient, partially-participating, linearized-ADMM algorithm. The authors prove an oracle property for SROF, establish asymptotic normality for nonzero components, and show convergence of RowFed to a stationary point with faster iterate-gap contraction under higher participation. Empirically, RowFed consistently improves estimation and prediction accuracy and yields interpretable, variable-level clustering in synthetic studies and a real-world Communities and Crime dataset, outperforming NonFed, FedAvg, and a matrix-fusion baseline. Collectively, row-wise fusion provides a scalable, transparent framework that bridges entry-wise and matrix-wise approaches for large-scale personalized federated multivariate learning.

Abstract

We study personalized federated learning for multivariate responses where client models are heterogeneous yet share variable-level structure. Existing entry-wise penalties ignore cross-response dependence, while matrix-wise fusion over-couples clients. We propose a Sparse Row-wise Fusion (SROF) regularizer that clusters row vectors across clients and induces within-row sparsity, and we develop RowFed, a communication-efficient federated algorithm that embeds SROF into a linearized ADMM framework with privacy-preserving partial participation. Theoretically, we establish an oracle property for SROF-achieving correct variable-level group recovery with asymptotic normality-and prove convergence of RowFed to a stationary solution. Under random client participation, the iterate gap contracts at a rate that improves with participation probability. Empirically, simulations in heterogeneous regimes show that RowFed consistently lowers estimation and prediction error and strengthens variable-level cluster recovery over NonFed, FedAvg, and a personalized matrix-fusion baseline. A real-data study further corroborates these gains while preserving interpretability. Together, our results position row-wise fusion as an effective and transparent paradigm for large-scale personalized federated multivariate learning, bridging the gap between entry-wise and matrix-wise formulations.

Row-wise Fusion Regularization: An Interpretable Personalized Federated Learning Framework in Large-Scale Scenarios

TL;DR

The paper addresses personalized federated learning for multivariate outcomes under client heterogeneity and cross-variable dependencies. It introduces Sparse Row-wise Fusion (SROF) to cluster coefficient rows across clients while enforcing within-row sparsity, and develops RowFed, a communication-efficient, partially-participating, linearized-ADMM algorithm. The authors prove an oracle property for SROF, establish asymptotic normality for nonzero components, and show convergence of RowFed to a stationary point with faster iterate-gap contraction under higher participation. Empirically, RowFed consistently improves estimation and prediction accuracy and yields interpretable, variable-level clustering in synthetic studies and a real-world Communities and Crime dataset, outperforming NonFed, FedAvg, and a matrix-fusion baseline. Collectively, row-wise fusion provides a scalable, transparent framework that bridges entry-wise and matrix-wise approaches for large-scale personalized federated multivariate learning.

Abstract

We study personalized federated learning for multivariate responses where client models are heterogeneous yet share variable-level structure. Existing entry-wise penalties ignore cross-response dependence, while matrix-wise fusion over-couples clients. We propose a Sparse Row-wise Fusion (SROF) regularizer that clusters row vectors across clients and induces within-row sparsity, and we develop RowFed, a communication-efficient federated algorithm that embeds SROF into a linearized ADMM framework with privacy-preserving partial participation. Theoretically, we establish an oracle property for SROF-achieving correct variable-level group recovery with asymptotic normality-and prove convergence of RowFed to a stationary solution. Under random client participation, the iterate gap contracts at a rate that improves with participation probability. Empirically, simulations in heterogeneous regimes show that RowFed consistently lowers estimation and prediction error and strengthens variable-level cluster recovery over NonFed, FedAvg, and a personalized matrix-fusion baseline. A real-data study further corroborates these gains while preserving interpretability. Together, our results position row-wise fusion as an effective and transparent paradigm for large-scale personalized federated multivariate learning, bridging the gap between entry-wise and matrix-wise formulations.
Paper Structure (28 sections, 11 theorems, 101 equations, 2 figures, 3 tables, 1 algorithm)

This paper contains 28 sections, 11 theorems, 101 equations, 2 figures, 3 tables, 1 algorithm.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let assumptions in Lemma 1 and Assumptions 2 hold. If $\rho^{(t+1)}=\alpha \rho^{(t)}$ and $\frac{\min \left\{\lambda_{1}^{2}, \lambda_{2}^{2}\right\}}{2}>\mathcal{L}_{0}+\frac{c_{\lambda} \alpha(\alpha+1)}{2 \rho^{(0)}(\alpha-1)}$ , where $c_{\lambda}$ is a positive constant decided by $\lambda_{1}

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Varied dimensions $(p,q)$. Means (s.d.) over 100 replicates. MSE-Est / MSE-Pred scaled by $10^2$.
  • Figure 2: Boxplots of MSEs across states for PerFL-LSMA and RowFed.

Theorems & Definitions (11)

  • Theorem 1: Convergence of Algorithm 1
  • Proposition 1
  • Theorem 2
  • Theorem 3
  • Lemma 1: KKT Conditions
  • Theorem 4
  • Theorem 5
  • Proposition 2: Lipschitz continuous property
  • Lemma 2: Lagrangian Reduction of Updating $\bm\Theta$
  • Lemma 3
  • ...and 1 more