Less is More: Improving LLM Reasoning with Minimal Test-Time Intervention
Zhen Yang, Mingyang Zhang, Feng Chen, Ganggui Ding, Liang Hou, Xin Tao, Pengfei Wan, Ying-Cong Chen
TL;DR
The paper tackles the inefficiency of test-time reasoning by showing that errors concentrate in a small set of high-entropy tokens. It introduces Minimal Test-Time Intervention (MTI), a training-free framework that applies classifier-free guidance selectively at high-entropy positions and uses lightweight negative-prompt guidance via KV-cache reuse to approximate the unconditional distribution. MTI yields robust improvements across general, coding, and STEM benchmarks (e.g., +$9.28\%$ on six tasks with DeepSeek-R1-7B and +$11.25\%$ on AIME2024 with Ling-mini-2.0), with modest CFG usage, and extends to vision-language models as a plug-and-play enhancement compatible with existing decoding strategies and accelerators.
Abstract
Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) has focused on test-time scaling to improve reasoning via increased inference computation, but often at the cost of efficiency. We revisit test-time behavior and uncover a simple yet underexplored phenomenon: reasoning uncertainty is highly localized-only a small subset of high-entropy tokens dominantly affects output correctness. Motivated by this, we propose Minimal Test-Time Intervention (MTI), a training-free framework that enhances reasoning accuracy and stability with minimal overhead. MTI includes: (i) Selective CFG intervention, applying classifier-free guidance only at uncertain positions; and (ii) Lightweight negative-prompt guidance, reusing the main model's KV cache to approximate unconditional decoding efficiently. MTI yields consistent gains across general, coding, and STEM tasks-e.g., +9.28% average improvement on six benchmarks for DeepSeek-R1-7B and +11.25% on AIME2024 using Ling-mini-2.0-while remaining highly efficient.
