Rationality of hypersurfaces
Stefan Schreieder
TL;DR
This survey aggregates state-of-the-art methods in the rationality problem for hypersurfaces, emphasizing cycle-theoretic, unramified cohomology, motivic, and combinatorial (regular matroid) techniques. It explains how diagonal decompositions and CH$_0$-triviality yield concrete obstructions to rationality, and it highlights sharp results: logarithmic and linear degree bounds ruling out retract/stable rationality in broad regimes, and culminates in the irrationality of very general cubic fourfolds and cubic threefolds via intermediate Jacobians and matroid-based obstructions. The work also discusses how modern degeneration and motivic strategies turn rationality questions into computable invariants, and how these interact with families and base fields. Overall, the paper maps a multi-faceted toolkit that has driven substantial progress in understanding when hypersurfaces fail to be rational, with implications for higher-dimensional birational geometry and beyond.
Abstract
We survey recent developments on rationality problems for algebraic varieties, with a particular emphasis on cycle-theoretic and combinatorial methods and their applications to hypersurfaces.
