Non-Clifford Fusion: T-Gate Optimization for Quantum Simulation
Yingheng Li, Xulong Tang, Paul Hovland, Ji Liu
TL;DR
This work targets efficient Hamiltonian simulation on fault-tolerant quantum computers by reducing T-gate count and depth. It introduces Non-Clifford Fusion (NCF), a two-stage framework that groups Pauli strings and uses Clifford circuit conjugation to merge RZ rotations into single-qubit or two-qubit unitaries, enabling parallelized and more compact synthesis with $U3$ or multi-qubit block synthesizers. Across 13 benchmarks, single-qubit NCF achieves average reductions of about 57% in T-gate count and around 49% in T-gate depth and Clifford count compared with state-of-the-art baselines; two-qubit NCF further improves T-gate counts, though depth gains are limited by unitary width. The method leverages tableau-based Clifford conjugation, anticommuting/grouping strategies, and a sliding window to balance optimization opportunities with computational cost, offering a practical pathway to more scalable fault-tolerant Hamiltonian simulation.
Abstract
Hamiltonian simulation is a key quantum algorithm for modeling complex systems. To implement a Hamiltonian simulation, it is typically decomposed into a list of Pauli strings, each corresponds to an RZ rotation gate with many Clifford gates. These RZ gates are generally synthesized into a sequence of Clifford and T gates in fault-tolerant quantum computers, where the T-gate count and T-gate depth are critical metrics for such systems. In this paper, we propose NCF, a compilation framework that reduces both the T-gate count and T-gate depth for Hamiltonian simulation. NCF partitions Pauli strings into groups, where each group can be conjugated (i.e., transformed) into a list of Pauli strings that apply quantum gates on a restricted subset of qubits, allowing for simultaneous synthesis of the whole group and reducing both T-gate count and depth. Experimental results demonstrate that NCF achieves an average reduction of 57.4%, 49.1%, and 49.0% in T-gate count, T-gate depth, and Clifford count, respectively, compared to the state-of-the-art method.
