How Blind and Low-Vision Users Manage Their Passwords
Alexander Ponticello, Filipo Sharevski, Simon Anell, Katharina Krombholz
TL;DR
Blind and Low-Vision users rely on passwords and password managers (PMs) to balance security with usability. Through 33 qualitative interviews, the study reveals that PM adoption is strongly influenced by accessibility, with both deliberate and impromptu uptake shaping initial use; however, practical accessibility gaps lead to ongoing insecure practices such as password reuse, predictable schemes, and braille password lists. The authors propose design interventions—accessible password generators, emphasis on biometrics, and BLV-informed vendor testing—alongside consideration of passwordless options, framed within positive security and ontological security concepts. The work highlights actionable paths to make PMs genuinely usable for BLV users while maintaining autonomy and trust, contributing to more inclusive, secure authentication practices.
Abstract
Managing passwords securely and conveniently is still an open problem for many users. Existing research has examined users' password management strategies and identified pain points, such as security concerns, leading to insecure practices. We investigate how Blind and Low-Vision (BLV) users tackle this problem and how password managers can assist them. This paper presents the results of a qualitative interview study with N = 33 BLV participants. We found that all participants utilize password managers to some extent, which they perceive as fairly accessible. However, the adoption is mainly driven by the convenience of storing and retrieving passwords. The security advantages - generating strong, random passwords - were avoided mainly due to the absence of practical accessibility. Password managers do not adhere to BLV users' underlying needs for agency, which stem from experiences with inaccessible software and vendors who deprioritize accessibility issues. Underutilization of password managers leads BLV users to adopt insecure practices, such as reusing predictable passwords or resorting to 'security through obscurity' by writing important credentials in braille. We conclude our analysis by discussing the need to implement practical accessibility and usability improvements for password managers as a way of establishing trust and secure practices while maintaining BLV users' agency.
