CoT-Evo: Evolutionary Distillation of Chain-of-Thought for Scientific Reasoning
Kehua Feng, Keyan Ding, Zhihui Zhu, Lei Liang, Qiang Zhang, Huajun Chen
TL;DR
CoT-Evo introduces an evolutionary framework for distilling chain-of-thought reasoning tailored to scientific tasks. It builds a diverse candidate pool from multiple thinkers, augments knowledge, and refines CoTs through novelty-driven selection, reflective recombination, and mutation within an evaluation loop. A fitness function combining correctness, length appropriateness, and knowledge usage guides evolution, producing a compact, high-fidelity CoT dataset for training smaller models. Empirical results on BioProBench and ChemCoTBench show consistent improvements over traditional distillation baselines and competitive performance against larger LLM teachers, highlighting the approach's scalability and robustness for science-related reasoning.
Abstract
While chain-of-thought (CoT) distillation from advanced large language models (LLMs) has proven effective in general reasoning tasks, it struggles in scientific domains where even advanced models often produce incorrect or superficial reasoning due to high complexity and specialized knowledge requirements. Directly distilling from such flawed outputs results in low-quality training data and limits the performance of smaller student models. To overcome this, we propose CoT-Evo, an evolutionary CoT distillation framework. It begins by constructing a diverse pool of reasoning trajectories from multiple LLM thinkers, enriches them with automatically retrieved domain knowledge, and iteratively refines the trajectories using novelty-driven selection, reflective recombination and mutation. The refinement is guided by a fitness function that evaluates answer correctness, coherence, and effective knowledge utilization. This results in a high-quality CoT dataset tailored for scientific reasoning. We employ this evolved dataset to fine-tune a compact model, which achieves state-of-the-art performance on scientific reasoning benchmarks. Our work establishes a scalable approach to synthesizing high-fidelity scientific reasoning data from diverse and fallible LLMs.
