Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Micro-Macro Backstepping Control of Large-Scale Hyperbolic Systems (Extended Version)

Jukka-Pekka Humaloja, Nikolaos Bekiaris-Liberis

Abstract

We introduce a control design and analysis framework for micro-macro, boundary control of large-scale, $n+m$ hyperbolic PDE systems. Specifically, we develop feedback laws for stabilization of hyperbolic systems at the micro level (i.e., of the large-scale system) that employ a) measurements obtained from the $n+m$ system (i.e., at micro level) and kernels constructed based on an $\infty+\infty$ continuum system counterpart (i.e., at macro level), or b) kernels and measurements both stemming from a continuum counterpart, or c) averaged-continuum kernels/measurements. We also address (d)) stabilization of the continuum (macro) system, employing continuum kernels and measurements. Towards addressing d) we derive in a constructive manner an $\infty+\infty$ continuum approximation of $n+m$ hyperbolic systems and establish that its solutions approximate, for large $n$ and $m$, the solutions of the $n+m$ system. We then construct a feedback law for stabilization of the $\infty+\infty$ system via introduction of a continuum-PDE backstepping transformation. We establish well-posedness of the resulting 4-D kernel equations and prove closed-loop stability via construction of a novel Lyapunov functional. Furthermore, under control configuration a) we establish that the closed-loop system is exponentially stable provided that $n$ and $m$ are large, by proving that the exact, stabilizing $n+m$ control kernels can be accurately approximated by the continuum kernels. While under control configurations b) and c), we establish closed-loop stability capitalizing on the established solutions' and kernels' approximation properties via employment of infinite-dimensional ISS arguments. We provide two numerical simulation examples to illustrate the effectiveness and potential limitations of our design approach.

Micro-Macro Backstepping Control of Large-Scale Hyperbolic Systems (Extended Version)

Abstract

We introduce a control design and analysis framework for micro-macro, boundary control of large-scale, hyperbolic PDE systems. Specifically, we develop feedback laws for stabilization of hyperbolic systems at the micro level (i.e., of the large-scale system) that employ a) measurements obtained from the system (i.e., at micro level) and kernels constructed based on an continuum system counterpart (i.e., at macro level), or b) kernels and measurements both stemming from a continuum counterpart, or c) averaged-continuum kernels/measurements. We also address (d)) stabilization of the continuum (macro) system, employing continuum kernels and measurements. Towards addressing d) we derive in a constructive manner an continuum approximation of hyperbolic systems and establish that its solutions approximate, for large and , the solutions of the system. We then construct a feedback law for stabilization of the system via introduction of a continuum-PDE backstepping transformation. We establish well-posedness of the resulting 4-D kernel equations and prove closed-loop stability via construction of a novel Lyapunov functional. Furthermore, under control configuration a) we establish that the closed-loop system is exponentially stable provided that and are large, by proving that the exact, stabilizing control kernels can be accurately approximated by the continuum kernels. While under control configurations b) and c), we establish closed-loop stability capitalizing on the established solutions' and kernels' approximation properties via employment of infinite-dimensional ISS arguments. We provide two numerical simulation examples to illustrate the effectiveness and potential limitations of our design approach.
Paper Structure (24 sections, 10 theorems, 130 equations, 5 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 24 sections, 10 theorems, 130 equations, 5 figures, 1 table.

Key Result

Theorem II.6

Consider an $n+m$ system eq:nmm, eq:nmmbc with parameters $\pmb{\Lambda}, \mathbf{M}, \pmb{\Sigma}, \mathbf{W}, \pmb{\Theta}, \pmb{\Psi}, \mathbf{Q}, \mathbf{R}$  satisfying Assumption ass:nm, initial condition $(\mathbf{u}_0,\mathbf{v}_0) \in E$, and input $\mathbf{U} \in L^2([0, T]; \mathbb{R}^m)$ Then, there exists some $\delta_T > 0$ depending continuously on $\varepsilon, \varepsilon_{u,v}$,

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: Illustrations for the domains of the boundary conditions \ref{['eq:nmkbcF21']} (upper row) and \ref{['eq:nmkbcF22']} (lower row) for $m=7,21$, and the limits as $m\to\infty$, corresponding to the domains of \ref{['eq:infkbc3']}, \ref{['eq:infkbc4']} in $(\eta,\zeta)$.
  • Figure 2: Illustration of $\xi = \rho(x,\eta,\zeta)$ projected on $\zeta=1$. The characteristic hypersurface is a collection of such surfaces over all $0 \leq \eta \leq \zeta \leq 1$, which all contain the line $\xi = x$ at $\eta=\zeta$.
  • Figure 3: The controls $U(t,\eta)$ from \ref{['eq:infU']} for $t \in [0,5]$ and $\eta \in [0,1]$.
  • Figure 4: Norm of the solution of the $n+m$ system for different $n=m$ under the continuum-kernels-based control law \ref{['eq:infUappr1']} for $t \in [0, 5]$.
  • Figure 5: Uppermost plot: norm of the solution of the $n+m$ system under the control law \ref{['eq:infUappr2']}, employing measurements/kernels, according to \ref{['eq:infUappr2k']} with \ref{['eq:uvave']}, and \ref{['eq:2x2k']}, \ref{['eq:2x2kbc']} with $\tilde{u} \equiv \bar{u}, \tilde{v} \equiv \bar{v}$, from the continuum and average approximations, respectively, and a comparison to the autonomous system's solution. Lower plots: the respective control inputs \ref{['eq:infUappr2']} (where each component of $\mathbf{U}$ coincides with $U$ in the bottom plot).

Theorems & Definitions (26)

  • Remark II.3
  • Remark II.4
  • Remark II.5
  • Theorem II.6
  • proof
  • Remark II.7
  • Theorem III.1
  • proof
  • Remark III.2
  • Theorem IV.1
  • ...and 16 more