Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Superradiance and Superabsorption Engine of $N$ Two-Level Systems: $N^{2}$-Power Scaling at Near-Unity Efficiency

L. F. Alves da Silva, H. Sanchez, M. A. Ponte, M. H. Y. Moussa, Norton G. de Almeida

TL;DR

The paper tackles the challenge of creating scalable quantum heat engines by exploiting cooperative effects in ensembles of $N$ two-level systems. It introduces a unified mean-field approach that describes both superradiant emission and superabsorption as unitary strokes with $\mathrm{sech}^2$-shaped pulses, yielding a quadratic power scaling $P \propto N^{2}$ while achieving efficiencies approaching unity. Through analytic mean-field results and exact numerical simulations up to $N=500$, the work shows that the cycle—comprising a pumping stroke to invert population and a subsequent emission stroke—operates with minimal heat exchange during the pulses and rapid convergence to a stable limit cycle under repeated operation. These findings suggest a practical route to scalable, high-performance quantum heat engines based on collective phenomena in engineered reservoirs and provide guidance on parameter regimes for near-term experimental realization.

Abstract

We present a thermal engine that exploits the \emph{cooperative superradiance} and \emph{superabsorption} of a sample of \(N\) two-level atoms. This engine operates using a single cold reservoir via cycles of collective pumping followed by decay. Using an effective mean-field Hamiltonian to describe the many-body dynamics, we design optimized drive pulses that preserve adiabaticity and achieve an average power output scaling quadratically with the system size, \(P \propto N^2\). An experimentally measurable figure of merit demonstrates that the efficiency of this superengine can approach unity. The resulting analytical model, which yields a representative Hamiltonian for the sample within the mean-field formalism, is validated by numerical simulations. Our results pave the way for scalable and highly efficient quantum heat engines based on collective effects.

Superradiance and Superabsorption Engine of $N$ Two-Level Systems: $N^{2}$-Power Scaling at Near-Unity Efficiency

TL;DR

The paper tackles the challenge of creating scalable quantum heat engines by exploiting cooperative effects in ensembles of two-level systems. It introduces a unified mean-field approach that describes both superradiant emission and superabsorption as unitary strokes with -shaped pulses, yielding a quadratic power scaling while achieving efficiencies approaching unity. Through analytic mean-field results and exact numerical simulations up to , the work shows that the cycle—comprising a pumping stroke to invert population and a subsequent emission stroke—operates with minimal heat exchange during the pulses and rapid convergence to a stable limit cycle under repeated operation. These findings suggest a practical route to scalable, high-performance quantum heat engines based on collective phenomena in engineered reservoirs and provide guidance on parameter regimes for near-term experimental realization.

Abstract

We present a thermal engine that exploits the \emph{cooperative superradiance} and \emph{superabsorption} of a sample of two-level atoms. This engine operates using a single cold reservoir via cycles of collective pumping followed by decay. Using an effective mean-field Hamiltonian to describe the many-body dynamics, we design optimized drive pulses that preserve adiabaticity and achieve an average power output scaling quadratically with the system size, . An experimentally measurable figure of merit demonstrates that the efficiency of this superengine can approach unity. The resulting analytical model, which yields a representative Hamiltonian for the sample within the mean-field formalism, is validated by numerical simulations. Our results pave the way for scalable and highly efficient quantum heat engines based on collective effects.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 11 sections, 36 equations, 7 figures.

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: Superabsorption. Comparison of the analytical pulse $I_0\,\mathop{\mathrm{sech}}\nolimits^2\!\bigl(\tfrac{t - t_d}{\tau}\bigr)$ (dashed-black line) and the simulated (exact) absorbed intensity (solid-blue line), obtained from an initial thermal states undergoing collective decay. Input parameters: $N=300$, $\gamma_{\mathrm{up}}=0.01$, $T=0.5$. Derived parameters: $t_d=28.9559$, $r = 0.7616$, $\theta_0 = 0.7050$ rad, and $\tau=0.8754$. The inset shows the polarization dynamics $\langle J_z(t)\rangle$ versus. $t$. Time is given in units of $1/\omega_0$.
  • Figure 2: Superradiance. Comparison of the analytical pulse $I_0\,\mathop{\mathrm{sech}}\nolimits^2\!\bigl(\tfrac{t - t_d}{\tau}\bigr)$ (dashed black line with diamond markers) and the simulated radiated intensity (solid blue line with circle markers) starting from an initial thermal state undergoing collective absorption. Input parameters: $N=300$, $\omega_0=1.0$, $\gamma_{\mathrm{down}}=0.01$, $T = -0.5$. Since the population is inverted due to the collective pumping, we performed this simulation using a Gibbs state with effective negative temperature. Derived parameters: $t_d = 0.8754$, $r = 0.7616$, $\theta_0 = 0.7050$ rad, and $\tau = 0.8754$. The inset shows the polarization dynamics $\langle J_z(t) \rangle$ versus $t$. Time is given in units of $1/\omega_0$.
  • Figure 3: Superengine Cycle: The atomic sample begins in a thermal state with disordered dipole moments. It then undergoes multimodal pumping, triggering a superabsorption effect that inverts its population and orders the dipoles. This is followed by a superradiance emission, after which the sample re-thermalizes with the reservoir.
  • Figure 4: Superpulses across $k=5$ cycles. Dotted (green) curve: pumping on; dashed (yellow) curve: natural decay with pumping off; solid (blue) curve: resultant intensity during both superabsorption and superradiance strokes. Input parameters (in units of $\omega_0$): $N=80$, $T_c=0.5$, $\gamma_{\mathrm{down}}=0.01$, $\gamma_{\mathrm{up}} = 3.5\,\gamma_{\mathrm{down}}$.
  • Figure 5: Efficiency $\eta$ versus number of cycles $k$. The high efficiency is a hallmark of the superengine. Input parameters (in units of $\omega_0$): $N=80$, $T_c =0.5$, $\gamma_{\mathrm{down}}=0.01$, $\gamma_{\mathrm{up}} = 3.5\,\gamma_{\mathrm{down}}$.
  • ...and 2 more figures