Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Presentation and uniqueness of Kac-Moody groups over local rings

Timothée Marquis, Bernhard Mühlherr

TL;DR

This work proves that for a 2-spherical generalized Cartan matrix $A$ and a valuation ring $R$ satisfying condition $(co)$, the canonical map $\mathfrak{G}_A(R)\to\mathfrak{G}_A^{\min}(R)$ is injective, yielding $\mathfrak{G}_A(R)\cong \mathfrak{G}_A^{\min}(R)\subseteq \mathfrak{G}_A(\mathbb{K})$ where $\mathbb{K}$ is the field of fractions of $R$. The authors establish this by presenting $\mathfrak{G}_A^{\min}(R)$ as a Curtis–Tits amalgam $\mathrm{CT}_A(R)$ built from rank-1 and rank-2 Chevalley groups, and by proving that the natural map $\mathrm{CT}_A(R)\to \mathfrak{G}_A(R)\to \mathfrak{G}_A^{\min}(R)$ is an isomorphism. A core geometric input is the construction of simply connected twin chamber systems associated to $G^{\min}_R$, together with a general result: if a twin chamber system is simply connected, then its opposition system $\mathrm{Opp}(\mathcal{C})$ is simply connected; this underpins the Curtis–Tits presentation in the ring setting. As a byproduct, Laurent polynomial rings $R[t,t^{-1}]$ are shown to be universal for root systems not of type $A_1$ in this context, generalizing Morita-type universality results to the Kac–Moody setting over valuation rings.

Abstract

To any generalised Cartan matrix (GCM) $A$ and any ring $R$, Tits associated a Kac-Moody group $\mathfrak{G}_A(R)$ defined by a presentation à la Steinberg. For a domain $R$ with field of fractions $\mathbb{K}$, we explore the question of whether the canonical map $\varphi_R\colon\thinspace \mathfrak{G}_A(R)\to \mathfrak{G}_A(\mathbb{K})$ is injective. This question for Cartan matrices has a long history, and for GCMs was already present in Tits' foundational papers on Kac-Moody groups. We prove that for any $2$-spherical GCM $A$, the map $\varphi_R$ is injective for all valuation rings $R$ (under an additional minor condition (co)). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first such injectivity result beyond the classical setting.

Presentation and uniqueness of Kac-Moody groups over local rings

TL;DR

This work proves that for a 2-spherical generalized Cartan matrix and a valuation ring satisfying condition , the canonical map is injective, yielding where is the field of fractions of . The authors establish this by presenting as a Curtis–Tits amalgam built from rank-1 and rank-2 Chevalley groups, and by proving that the natural map is an isomorphism. A core geometric input is the construction of simply connected twin chamber systems associated to , together with a general result: if a twin chamber system is simply connected, then its opposition system is simply connected; this underpins the Curtis–Tits presentation in the ring setting. As a byproduct, Laurent polynomial rings are shown to be universal for root systems not of type in this context, generalizing Morita-type universality results to the Kac–Moody setting over valuation rings.

Abstract

To any generalised Cartan matrix (GCM) and any ring , Tits associated a Kac-Moody group defined by a presentation à la Steinberg. For a domain with field of fractions , we explore the question of whether the canonical map is injective. This question for Cartan matrices has a long history, and for GCMs was already present in Tits' foundational papers on Kac-Moody groups. We prove that for any -spherical GCM , the map is injective for all valuation rings (under an additional minor condition (co)). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first such injectivity result beyond the classical setting.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 24 sections, 41 theorems, 79 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $A$ be a $2$-spherical GCM and $R$ be a valuation ring satisfying (co), with field of fractions $\mathbb{K}$. Then the canonical morphisms are isomorphisms. In particular, the map $\mathfrak{G}_A(R)\to\mathfrak{G}_A(\mathbb{K})$ is injective.

Theorems & Definitions (89)

  • Theorem 1
  • Remark 1
  • Remark 2
  • Corollary 2
  • Proposition 3
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Definition 2.3
  • ...and 79 more