Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the Ratat-Goormaghtigh equation and integer points close to the graph of a smooth function

Tomohiro Yamada

TL;DR

This work investigates the distribution of integer solutions to the Ratat-Goormaghtigh type equation for fixed $N>1$, focusing on how many pairs $(x,m)$ satisfy $\frac{x^m-1}{x-1}=N$ and how small the sum of reciprocals $\sum 1/x$ can be. The authors reformulate the problem as counting lattice points near the graph of a smooth function $f_N(x)=\frac{\log N+\log(x-1)}{\log x}$ and combine explicit near-graph bounds with Matveev's bounds on linear forms in logarithms to control the second solution $x_2$ and the overall solution set. They obtain explicit bounds: $\sum_{i\ge2} 1/x_i<5.9037$, with the sum vanishing as $N$ grows, and a tighter bound for prime $x$ of $\sum_{i\ge2} 1/q_i<0.73194$ plus a product bound $\prod_{i\ge2} q_i/(q_i-1)<2.07913$. These results advance quantitative understanding of the distribution of Ratat-Goormaghtigh solutions and demonstrate the effectiveness of combining lattice-point counts with lower bounds for linear forms in logarithms.

Abstract

We prove that the sum of reciprocals $1/x$ of integer solutions of $(x^m-1)/(x-1)=N$ with $x, m\geq 2$ for a given integer $N$ except the smallest $x$ is smaller than $5.9037$. If we limit $x$ to be prime, then the sum is smaller than $0.73194$.

On the Ratat-Goormaghtigh equation and integer points close to the graph of a smooth function

TL;DR

This work investigates the distribution of integer solutions to the Ratat-Goormaghtigh type equation for fixed , focusing on how many pairs satisfy and how small the sum of reciprocals can be. The authors reformulate the problem as counting lattice points near the graph of a smooth function and combine explicit near-graph bounds with Matveev's bounds on linear forms in logarithms to control the second solution and the overall solution set. They obtain explicit bounds: , with the sum vanishing as grows, and a tighter bound for prime of plus a product bound . These results advance quantitative understanding of the distribution of Ratat-Goormaghtigh solutions and demonstrate the effectiveness of combining lattice-point counts with lower bounds for linear forms in logarithms.

Abstract

We prove that the sum of reciprocals of integer solutions of with for a given integer except the smallest is smaller than . If we limit to be prime, then the sum is smaller than .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 7 sections, 9 theorems, 76 equations, 1 table.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $(x_i, m_i)$ with $x_i$ and $m_i$ positive integers and $x_1<x_2<\cdots$ be all solutions $(x, m)$ of eq11. Then Moreover, the left hand side of the above inequality tends to zero as $N$ goes to infinity.

Theorems & Definitions (14)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Lemma 2.1
  • Lemma 2.2
  • Lemma 2.3
  • Lemma 3.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.3
  • ...and 4 more