Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Double, über and poset homology

Carlos Gabriel Valenzuela Ruiz

TL;DR

The paper compares two homology theories associated to a simplicial complex $\mathcal{K}$: uberhomology and the double homology of its moment-angle complex. It constructs and analyzes maps $\phi_{l,q}$ between the corresponding poset-cohomology expressions, proving isomorphisms for $l>2$ or $q>0$ and deriving an exact sequence in degree $(2,0)$. It further shows that the complete difference between the theories is captured by a simple, neighbourliness-dependent formula for the bigraded Poincaré series. Overall, the work provides a precise, case-by-case correspondence between uberhomology and double homology and highlights a sharp dichotomy dictated by neighbourliness.

Abstract

We present a comparison map between the uberhomology of a simplicial complex $\mathcal{K}$ and the double homology of its associated moment-angle complex $\mathcal{Z}_{\mathcal{K}}$. We show these two homology theories differ at three bidegrees, which depend on whether the complex $K$ is neighbourly or not.

Double, über and poset homology

TL;DR

The paper compares two homology theories associated to a simplicial complex : uberhomology and the double homology of its moment-angle complex. It constructs and analyzes maps between the corresponding poset-cohomology expressions, proving isomorphisms for or and deriving an exact sequence in degree . It further shows that the complete difference between the theories is captured by a simple, neighbourliness-dependent formula for the bigraded Poincaré series. Overall, the work provides a precise, case-by-case correspondence between uberhomology and double homology and highlights a sharp dichotomy dictated by neighbourliness.

Abstract

We present a comparison map between the uberhomology of a simplicial complex and the double homology of its associated moment-angle complex . We show these two homology theories differ at three bidegrees, which depend on whether the complex is neighbourly or not.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 5 sections, 7 theorems, 18 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 2.7

Construction 2.6 defines an exact functor $C^*(-):\text{Fun}(2^{[m]},\mathcal{A})\to \text{dg} \mathcal{A}$ into the category of differential graded objects of $\mathcal{A}$.

Theorems & Definitions (21)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Definition 2.3
  • Example 2.4
  • Definition 2.5
  • Proposition 2.7
  • proof
  • Example 2.8
  • Definition 2.9
  • Example 2.10
  • ...and 11 more