Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The smallest $n$-pure subtopos and dimension theory

Jens Hemelaer

TL;DR

This work develops a comprehensive dimension theory for Grothendieck toposes via n-pure geometric morphisms, introducing smallest n-pure subtopoi $ opos_{ le n+1}$ and a dimension $ ext{dim}( opos)$ measured against the content $ opos_{< in}$. It blends topos-theoretic localization, descent, and homotopy-theoretic methods (simplicial toposes, injective model structure, EM cohomology) to analyze dimension and boundary phenomena, including base-to-topos independence and connections to Galois theory and fundamental groups. The paper computes dimensions in key contexts: Boolean toposes (zero-dimensional), toposes of manifolds (dimension matches manifold dimension with boundary handling), rational lines, and monoid-related toposes; it then proves that petit étale toposes of excellent regular schemes in characteristic $0$ have dimension $2d$ for Krull dimension $d$, with $ ext{Spec}(b Z)$ giving dimension $2$. The results offer a robust framework to compare topological intuition with topos-theoretic dimension and provide calculational tools across spaces, monoids, and schemes using localization, descent, and EM cohomology. This has potential implications for understanding dimension in mixed characteristic settings and guidance for further topos-theoretic approaches to arithmetic geometry.

Abstract

We introduce the notion of $n$-pure geometric morphism between Grothendieck toposes, over a Grothendieck base topos $\mathcal{T}$. This is a higher-dimensional analogue of the concepts of dense and pure geometric morphism. We extend the construction of the smallest dense subtopos and smallest pure subtopos by constructing a smallest $n$-pure subtopos, for each natural number $n$. Based on this, we then propose a concept of dimension for a Grothendieck topos, in this way also arriving naturally at a distinction between toposes with boundary and toposes without boundary. We show that the zero-dimensional toposes without boundary are precisely the Boolean toposes, and that the topos associated to an $n$-manifold is again $n$-dimensional (with boundary if the manifold has a boundary). Some other toposes for which we calculate the dimension are the topos associated to the rational line and the toposes associated to a right Ore monoid or free monoid. Finally, we move to algebraic geometry: for a scheme $X$ of characteristic $0$ and Krull dimension $d$, we prove that the dimension of the associated petit étale topos is $2d$, assuming that $X$ is excellent and regular, or that $X$ is variety. As a first example in mixed characteristic, we show that the petit étale topos associated to $\mathrm{Spec}(\mathbb{Z})$ is two-dimensional.

The smallest $n$-pure subtopos and dimension theory

TL;DR

This work develops a comprehensive dimension theory for Grothendieck toposes via n-pure geometric morphisms, introducing smallest n-pure subtopoi and a dimension measured against the content . It blends topos-theoretic localization, descent, and homotopy-theoretic methods (simplicial toposes, injective model structure, EM cohomology) to analyze dimension and boundary phenomena, including base-to-topos independence and connections to Galois theory and fundamental groups. The paper computes dimensions in key contexts: Boolean toposes (zero-dimensional), toposes of manifolds (dimension matches manifold dimension with boundary handling), rational lines, and monoid-related toposes; it then proves that petit étale toposes of excellent regular schemes in characteristic have dimension for Krull dimension , with giving dimension . The results offer a robust framework to compare topological intuition with topos-theoretic dimension and provide calculational tools across spaces, monoids, and schemes using localization, descent, and EM cohomology. This has potential implications for understanding dimension in mixed characteristic settings and guidance for further topos-theoretic approaches to arithmetic geometry.

Abstract

We introduce the notion of -pure geometric morphism between Grothendieck toposes, over a Grothendieck base topos . This is a higher-dimensional analogue of the concepts of dense and pure geometric morphism. We extend the construction of the smallest dense subtopos and smallest pure subtopos by constructing a smallest -pure subtopos, for each natural number . Based on this, we then propose a concept of dimension for a Grothendieck topos, in this way also arriving naturally at a distinction between toposes with boundary and toposes without boundary. We show that the zero-dimensional toposes without boundary are precisely the Boolean toposes, and that the topos associated to an -manifold is again -dimensional (with boundary if the manifold has a boundary). Some other toposes for which we calculate the dimension are the topos associated to the rational line and the toposes associated to a right Ore monoid or free monoid. Finally, we move to algebraic geometry: for a scheme of characteristic and Krull dimension , we prove that the dimension of the associated petit étale topos is , assuming that is excellent and regular, or that is variety. As a first example in mixed characteristic, we show that the petit étale topos associated to is two-dimensional.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 67 sections, 75 theorems, 152 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 2.1

Let $\mathcal{E}$ be a Grothendieck topos. Let $\Xi$ be a class of monomorphisms in $\mathcal{E}$. Then $\Xi$ is the class of $J$-dense monomorphisms for a topology $J$ on $\mathcal{E}$ if and only if the following three conditions are satisfied:

Theorems & Definitions (179)

  • Proposition 2.1
  • proof
  • Remark 2.2
  • Corollary 2.3
  • proof
  • Remark 2.4
  • Remark 2.5
  • Example 2.6
  • Theorem 2.7
  • Remark 3.1
  • ...and 169 more