Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Uniformly-S-pseudo-projective modules

Mohammad adarbeh, Mohammad Saleh

TL;DR

The paper introduces uniform $S$-pseudo-projective modules, a generalization of existing $u$-$S$-projective and $u$-$S$-quasi-projective notions in a commutative-ring setting, with the defining property that for any submodule $K$ of $P$ there exists $s\

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce the notion of uniformly-S-pseudo-projective (u-S-pseudo-projective) modules as a generalization of u-S-projective modules. Let R be a ring and S a multiplicative subset of R. An R-module P is said to be u-S-pseudo-projective if for any submodule K of P, there is s\in S such that for any u-S-epimorphism f:P\to \frac{P}{K}, sf can be lifted to an endomorphism g:P\to P. Some properties of this notion are obtained. For example, we prove that an R-module M is u-S-quasi-projective if and only if M\oplus M is u-S-pseudo-projective. A new characterization of u-S-semisimple rings is given in terms of this notion.

Uniformly-S-pseudo-projective modules

TL;DR

The paper introduces uniform -pseudo-projective modules, a generalization of existing --projective and --quasi-projective notions in a commutative-ring setting, with the defining property that for any submodule of there exists $s\

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce the notion of uniformly-S-pseudo-projective (u-S-pseudo-projective) modules as a generalization of u-S-projective modules. Let R be a ring and S a multiplicative subset of R. An R-module P is said to be u-S-pseudo-projective if for any submodule K of P, there is s\in S such that for any u-S-epimorphism f:P\to \frac{P}{K}, sf can be lifted to an endomorphism g:P\to P. Some properties of this notion are obtained. For example, we prove that an R-module M is u-S-quasi-projective if and only if M\oplus M is u-S-pseudo-projective. A new characterization of u-S-semisimple rings is given in terms of this notion.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 2 sections, 15 theorems, 2 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 2.3

Let $S$ be a multiplicative subset of a ring $R$. Then the following statements hold:

Theorems & Definitions (37)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Remark 2.2
  • Proposition 2.3
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.4
  • proof
  • Corollary 2.5
  • proof
  • Definition 2.6
  • Theorem 2.7
  • ...and 27 more