Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Read the Room or Lead the Room: Understanding Socio-Cognitive Dynamics in Human-AI Teaming

Jaeyoon Choi, Mohammad Amin Samadi, Spencer JaQuay, Seehee Park, Nia Nixon

TL;DR

Read the Room or Lead the Room investigates how an autonomous GPT-4 AI teammate reshapes socio-cognitive dynamics in Collaborative Problem Solving. The authors analyze discourse from human-AI teaming experiments on the TRAIL platform, using LIWC and Group Communication Analysis to quantify cognitive leadership and social engagement. They find that AI teammates act as dominant cognitive facilitators, yet are socially detached, while humans paired with AI increase socially oriented language and depend on AI for organization. The work demonstrates learning analytics can reveal nuanced interaction patterns critical for designing effective human-AI teams and educational interventions.

Abstract

Research on Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS) has traditionally examined how humans rely on one another cognitively and socially to accomplish tasks together. With the rapid advancement of AI and large language models, however, a new question emerge: what happens to team dynamics when one of the "teammates" is not human? In this study, we investigate how the integration of an AI teammate -- a fully autonomous GPT-4 agent with social, cognitive, and affective capabilities -- shapes the socio-cognitive dynamics of CPS. We analyze discourse data collected from human-AI teaming (HAT) experiments conducted on a novel platform specifically designed for HAT research. Using two natural language processing (NLP) methods, specifically Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) and Group Communication Analysis (GCA), we found that AI teammates often assumed the role of dominant cognitive facilitators, guiding, planning, and driving group decision-making. However, they did so in a socially detached manner, frequently pushing agenda in a verbose and repetitive way. By contrast, humans working with AI used more language reflecting social processes, suggesting that they assumed more socially oriented roles. Our study highlights how learning analytics can provide critical insights into the socio-cognitive dynamics of human-AI collaboration.

Read the Room or Lead the Room: Understanding Socio-Cognitive Dynamics in Human-AI Teaming

TL;DR

Read the Room or Lead the Room investigates how an autonomous GPT-4 AI teammate reshapes socio-cognitive dynamics in Collaborative Problem Solving. The authors analyze discourse from human-AI teaming experiments on the TRAIL platform, using LIWC and Group Communication Analysis to quantify cognitive leadership and social engagement. They find that AI teammates act as dominant cognitive facilitators, yet are socially detached, while humans paired with AI increase socially oriented language and depend on AI for organization. The work demonstrates learning analytics can reveal nuanced interaction patterns critical for designing effective human-AI teams and educational interventions.

Abstract

Research on Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS) has traditionally examined how humans rely on one another cognitively and socially to accomplish tasks together. With the rapid advancement of AI and large language models, however, a new question emerge: what happens to team dynamics when one of the "teammates" is not human? In this study, we investigate how the integration of an AI teammate -- a fully autonomous GPT-4 agent with social, cognitive, and affective capabilities -- shapes the socio-cognitive dynamics of CPS. We analyze discourse data collected from human-AI teaming (HAT) experiments conducted on a novel platform specifically designed for HAT research. Using two natural language processing (NLP) methods, specifically Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) and Group Communication Analysis (GCA), we found that AI teammates often assumed the role of dominant cognitive facilitators, guiding, planning, and driving group decision-making. However, they did so in a socially detached manner, frequently pushing agenda in a verbose and repetitive way. By contrast, humans working with AI used more language reflecting social processes, suggesting that they assumed more socially oriented roles. Our study highlights how learning analytics can provide critical insights into the socio-cognitive dynamics of human-AI collaboration.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 16 sections, 1 figure, 3 tables.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Mean and 95% confidence intervals for LIWC and GCA measures, z-scored.