Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On a sequence of singular ball quotient surfaces on the line $K^2=9χ-18$

Carlos Rito, Xavier Roulleau

TL;DR

The paper constructs an infinite tower of normal surfaces starting from the Cartwright--Steger surface via successive $\mathbb{Z}/3$-Galois covers, producing minimal resolutions $\widetilde{X}_n$ that lie on the line $K^2=9\chi-18$ for $n>1$. It combines computational experiments on the Cartwright--Steger fundamental group with a geometric framework of 3-divisible singularities and Galois covers to analyze invariants and fundamental groups, proving that the first five $\widetilde{X}_n$ are simply connected and conjecturing that all are. The construction yields alternating towers of surfaces $S_n$ (ball quotients) and $X_n$, connected by $(\mathbb{Z}/3)^2$-covers, and demonstrates that the limit behavior approaches the Bogomolov--Miyaoka--Yau line while remaining near simply connected territory. A supplementary variant using $\frac{1}{3}(1,1)$-type singularities leads to $W_n$ with different invariants and initial fundamental groups, illustrating the method’s flexibility. The results advance understanding of geography near the ball quotient boundary and suggest a broad class of simply connected examples in proximity to the B-M-Y line.

Abstract

Starting from computer experiments with the fundamental group of the Cartwright--Steger surface, we construct an infinite tower $(X_n)_{n\ge 1}$ of normal projective surfaces obtained by successive $\mathbb Z/3$-Galois covers $X_{n}\to X_{n-1}$. For $n>1$, their minimal resolutions $\widetilde{X}_n$ lie on the line $K^2 = 9χ- 18$ (equivalently $c_1^2 = 3c_2 - 72$), which is parallel to the Bogomolov--Miyaoka--Yau line $K^2 = 9χ$ of ball quotients. We compute the fundamental groups for the first cases, showing that $π_1(\widetilde{X}_n)=1$ for $n=1,\ldots,5$. Motivated by the geometry of the construction, we conjecture that all $\widetilde{X}_n$ are simply connected.

On a sequence of singular ball quotient surfaces on the line $K^2=9χ-18$

TL;DR

The paper constructs an infinite tower of normal surfaces starting from the Cartwright--Steger surface via successive -Galois covers, producing minimal resolutions that lie on the line for . It combines computational experiments on the Cartwright--Steger fundamental group with a geometric framework of 3-divisible singularities and Galois covers to analyze invariants and fundamental groups, proving that the first five are simply connected and conjecturing that all are. The construction yields alternating towers of surfaces (ball quotients) and , connected by -covers, and demonstrates that the limit behavior approaches the Bogomolov--Miyaoka--Yau line while remaining near simply connected territory. A supplementary variant using -type singularities leads to with different invariants and initial fundamental groups, illustrating the method’s flexibility. The results advance understanding of geography near the ball quotient boundary and suggest a broad class of simply connected examples in proximity to the B-M-Y line.

Abstract

Starting from computer experiments with the fundamental group of the Cartwright--Steger surface, we construct an infinite tower of normal projective surfaces obtained by successive -Galois covers . For , their minimal resolutions lie on the line (equivalently ), which is parallel to the Bogomolov--Miyaoka--Yau line of ball quotients. We compute the fundamental groups for the first cases, showing that for . Motivated by the geometry of the construction, we conjecture that all are simply connected.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 7 sections, 4 theorems, 33 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 1

The fibers $F_{1},F_{2},F_{3}$ have the following configuration: where $B_i$ is the $(-3)$-curve which resolves the singularity $O_i',$$i=1,2,3,$ and $A_i,$$A_i'$ are the $(-2)$-curves which resolve the singularity $Q_i',$$i=1,\ldots,6.$

Theorems & Definitions (9)

  • Proposition 1
  • proof
  • Proposition 2
  • proof
  • Proposition 3
  • proof
  • Corollary 4
  • Conjecture 5
  • Remark 6