Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Degree 4 cohomological invariants of algebraic tori

Cyril Demarche, Hanqing Long

TL;DR

The paper addresses the problem of determining degree‑4 cohomological invariants of algebraic tori and their unramified cohomology. It develops a motivic framework, using slice filtration and the purity of the motive of the classifying space $BT$ to compute low‑degree étale motivic cohomology and derive exact sequences that describe $\mathrm{Inv}^4(T,\mathbb{Q/Z}(3))_{norm}$ and $H^4_{nr}(F(T),\mathbb{Q/Z}(3))$ in terms of $A^2(BT,K^M_3)$, CH groups, and Milnor K‑theory. The main contributions include a proof that $M(BT)$ is a pure Tate motive, explicit exact sequences relating degree‑4 invariants to Chow groups and Milnor K‑theory, and an explicit example of a torus with a nontrivial degree‑4 invariant not arising from degree‑3 invariants, illustrating the richness of the higher invariants. These results advance understanding of rationality questions and obstruction theories for tori by providing concrete formulas, diagrams, and examples for higher‑degree invariants and their unramified counterparts.

Abstract

In this paper, we determine the motive of the classifying torsor of an algebraic torus. As a result, we give an exact sequence describing the degree 4 cohomological invariants of algebraic tori. Using results by Blinstein and Merkurjev, this provides a formula for the degree 4 unramified cohomology group of an algebraic torus, via a flasque resolution.

Degree 4 cohomological invariants of algebraic tori

TL;DR

The paper addresses the problem of determining degree‑4 cohomological invariants of algebraic tori and their unramified cohomology. It develops a motivic framework, using slice filtration and the purity of the motive of the classifying space to compute low‑degree étale motivic cohomology and derive exact sequences that describe and in terms of , CH groups, and Milnor K‑theory. The main contributions include a proof that is a pure Tate motive, explicit exact sequences relating degree‑4 invariants to Chow groups and Milnor K‑theory, and an explicit example of a torus with a nontrivial degree‑4 invariant not arising from degree‑3 invariants, illustrating the richness of the higher invariants. These results advance understanding of rationality questions and obstruction theories for tori by providing concrete formulas, diagrams, and examples for higher‑degree invariants and their unramified counterparts.

Abstract

In this paper, we determine the motive of the classifying torsor of an algebraic torus. As a result, we give an exact sequence describing the degree 4 cohomological invariants of algebraic tori. Using results by Blinstein and Merkurjev, this provides a formula for the degree 4 unramified cohomology group of an algebraic torus, via a flasque resolution.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 10 sections, 14 theorems, 49 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $T$ be a torus over a perfect field $F$. Then there is a natural commutative diagram: \begin{tikzcd} & [-2.5em] \left(\widehat{T} \otimes K^M_2(F_{sep})\right)^\Gamma \arrow[d] &[-2.5em]&[-2em] \mathrm{Inv}^3(T, \mathbb{Q/Z}(2))_{norm}\otimes F^*\arrow[lldd, "\gamma" above]\arrow[ldd, "\cup"

Theorems & Definitions (25)

  • Theorem
  • Lemma 2.1
  • Lemma 2.2
  • Proposition 3.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.2
  • proof
  • Corollary 3.3
  • proof
  • Corollary 3.4
  • ...and 15 more