Evaluating Multiconfigurational Trials for Accurate Phaseless Auxiliary-Field Quantum Monte Carlo on 3d Transition Metal Complexes
Hung T. Vuong, Ankit Mahajan, John L. Weber, James Shee, David R. Reichman, Richard A. Friesner
TL;DR
This work tackles the challenge of accurately predicting ionization potentials for transition metal complexes by leveraging phaseless AFQMC with multiconfigurational trial wavefunctions. It benchmarks three scalable MC-trial protocols (CASSCF small active space, HCIx2, and HCI-CASSCF) on the 3dTMV set and metallocenes, employing TZ and CBS extrapolation to approach experimental accuracy. The results identify HCI-CASSCF as a highly practical default for large systems, while DLPNO-CCSD(T1)/UB3LYP CBS corrections provide reliable, cost-effective extrapolations; ph-AFQMC with CISD trials also delivers excellent accuracy at higher cost. The findings enable scalable, high-accuracy quantum-chemical modeling of TM complexes and offer concrete CBS strategies to balance precision and computational effort.
Abstract
In this study, we evaluate multi-configurational trial wave function protocols for phaseless auxiliary field quantum Monte Carlo (ph-AFQMC) on transition metal containing systems. First, we benchmark vertical ionization potentials for 22 3d transition metal complexes against published high-accuracy ph-AFQMC values in a double zeta basis set. We then compute the vertical ionization potential for a set of six metallocenes using our best-performing protocol, alongside ph-AFQMC using a configuration interaction singles and doubles (CISD) trial state. We also analyze the performance of canonical coupled-cluster theory with singles, doubles and perturbative triples (CCSD(T)), as well as its local approximation using domain-based local pair natural orbitals (DLPNO-CCSD(T1)) using different reference orbitals. To reach the complete-basis-set (CBS) limit, we examine several extrapolation schemes and report CBS-limit ph-AFQMC and CCSD(T) values alongside experimental results. We find that ph-AFQMC with the best-performing trial in a triple zeta basis, followed by CBS correction from DLPNO-CCSD(T1) with unrestricted B3LYP reference orbitals, yields small deviations from experiment at modest cost. Using a CISD trial state in ph-AFQMC gives the closest agreement with experiment (errors < 2 kcal/mol), albeit with lower scalability.
