Table of Contents
Fetching ...

$\mathsf{P} \neq \mathsf{NP}$: A Non-Relativizing Proof via Quantale Weakness and Geometric Complexity

Ben Goertzel

TL;DR

The paper tackles the foundational question of P versus NP by constructing a distribution-specific, non-relativizing hardness framework. It combines a weakness calculus based on polytime-capped conditional description length with a masked random 3-CNF ensemble that is symmetric and locally tree-like, enabling a Switching-by-Weakness normal form that yields per-bit locality on a sizable block fraction. Through neutrality and sparsification, most per-bit rules appear near-random on many blocks, which, together with independent block structure, produces exponential decay in success for any short decoder. A Compression-from-Success argument then yields a linear lower bound on the polytime-capped description length of the witness tuple, which clashes with the uniform constant-length witness finder implied by a hypothetical $\mathsf{P}=\mathsf{NP}$ world, thereby proving $\mathsf{P} \neq \mathsf{NP}$. The approach is non-relativizing and non-naturalizing, relying on explicit sampling, promise-verification, and automorphisms of the ensemble to drive the argument, and it points to modular open problems such as derandomization and extension to broader ensembles.

Abstract

We give a compositional, information-theoretic framework that turns short programs into locality on many independent blocks, and combine it with symmetry and sparsity of masked random Unique-SAT to obtain distributional lower bounds that contradict the self-reduction upper bound under $\mathsf{P}=\mathsf{NP}$. We work in the weakness quantale $w_Q=K_{\mathrm{poly}}(\cdot\mid\cdot)$. For an efficiently samplable ensemble $D_m$ made by masking random $3$-CNFs with fresh $S_m\ltimes(\mathbb{Z}_2)^m$ symmetries and a small-seed Valiant--Vazirani isolation layer, we prove a Switching-by-Weakness normal form: for any polytime decoder $P$ of description length $\le δt$ (with $t=Θ(m)$ blocks), a short wrapper $W$ makes $(P\circ W)$ per-bit local on a $γ$-fraction of blocks. Two ingredients then force near-randomness on $Ω(t)$ blocks for every short decoder: (a) a sign-invariant neutrality lemma giving $\Pr[X_i=1\mid \mathcal{I}]=1/2$ for any sign-invariant view $\mathcal{I}$; and (b) a template sparsification theorem at logarithmic radius showing that any fixed local rule appears with probability $m^{-Ω(1)}$. Combined with single-block bounds for tiny $\mathrm{ACC}^0$/streaming decoders, this yields a success bound $2^{-Ω(t)}$ and, by Compression-from-Success, $K_{\mathrm{poly}}\big((X_1,\ldots,X_t)\mid(Φ_1,\ldots,Φ_t)\big)\ge ηt$. If $\mathsf{P}=\mathsf{NP}$, a uniform constant-length program maps any on-promise instance to its unique witness in polytime (bit fixing via a $\mathrm{USAT}$ decider), so $K_{\mathrm{poly}}(X\midΦ)\le O(1)$ and the tuple complexity is $O(1)$, contradicting the linear bound. The proof is non-relativizing and non-natural; symmetry, sparsification, and switching yield a quantale upper-lower clash, hence $\mathsf{P}\ne\mathsf{NP}$.

$\mathsf{P} \neq \mathsf{NP}$: A Non-Relativizing Proof via Quantale Weakness and Geometric Complexity

TL;DR

The paper tackles the foundational question of P versus NP by constructing a distribution-specific, non-relativizing hardness framework. It combines a weakness calculus based on polytime-capped conditional description length with a masked random 3-CNF ensemble that is symmetric and locally tree-like, enabling a Switching-by-Weakness normal form that yields per-bit locality on a sizable block fraction. Through neutrality and sparsification, most per-bit rules appear near-random on many blocks, which, together with independent block structure, produces exponential decay in success for any short decoder. A Compression-from-Success argument then yields a linear lower bound on the polytime-capped description length of the witness tuple, which clashes with the uniform constant-length witness finder implied by a hypothetical world, thereby proving . The approach is non-relativizing and non-naturalizing, relying on explicit sampling, promise-verification, and automorphisms of the ensemble to drive the argument, and it points to modular open problems such as derandomization and extension to broader ensembles.

Abstract

We give a compositional, information-theoretic framework that turns short programs into locality on many independent blocks, and combine it with symmetry and sparsity of masked random Unique-SAT to obtain distributional lower bounds that contradict the self-reduction upper bound under . We work in the weakness quantale . For an efficiently samplable ensemble made by masking random -CNFs with fresh symmetries and a small-seed Valiant--Vazirani isolation layer, we prove a Switching-by-Weakness normal form: for any polytime decoder of description length (with blocks), a short wrapper makes per-bit local on a -fraction of blocks. Two ingredients then force near-randomness on blocks for every short decoder: (a) a sign-invariant neutrality lemma giving for any sign-invariant view ; and (b) a template sparsification theorem at logarithmic radius showing that any fixed local rule appears with probability . Combined with single-block bounds for tiny /streaming decoders, this yields a success bound and, by Compression-from-Success, . If , a uniform constant-length program maps any on-promise instance to its unique witness in polytime (bit fixing via a decider), so and the tuple complexity is , contradicting the linear bound. The proof is non-relativizing and non-natural; symmetry, sparsification, and switching yield a quantale upper-lower clash, hence .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 117 sections, 51 theorems, 85 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 2.2

For all $x,z,y$,

Theorems & Definitions (120)

  • Definition 2.1: Polytime-capped conditional description length
  • Lemma 2.2: Monotonicity and (coarse) chain rule
  • Lemma 2.3: Block additivity with small overhead
  • proof : Proof sketch
  • Remark 2.4: Tuple encoding overhead
  • Lemma 2.5: Compression from block success: coarse form
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.6: Per-bit enumerative coding
  • proof
  • Definition 2.7: SILS, $H_m$-invariance and interface
  • ...and 110 more