Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Isolation of non-triangle cycles in graphs

Peter Borg, Dayle Scicluna

TL;DR

The paper addresses the problem of bounding the F-isolation number for non-triangle cycles in graphs. It introduces the concept of F-isolating sets and focuses on the non-triangle cycle family $\mathcal{C}'$, establishing a tight bound $ι(G, \mathcal{C}') \le (m+1)/6$ for connected graphs with $m$ edges that are not 4-cycles, and fully characterizes the equality cases as pure $(m, C_4)$-special graphs or $\{C_4', C_5\}$-graphs. The result unifies and extends prior bounds for cycle families and yields as a corollary $ι(G, \{C_4\}) \le (m+1)/6$, aligning with previous work by Wei, Zhang and Zhao. The extremal graphs form infinite families, and the proof relies on a structural decomposition, induction on $m$, and a detailed analysis of residual components classified into specific special graph families, revealing the configurations that achieve equality. This contributes a precise understanding of cycle-avoidance via vertex neighborhoods and provides a framework for similar isolation-number bounds in related graph families.

Abstract

Given a set $\mathcal{F}$ of graphs, we call a copy of a graph in $\mathcal{F}$ an $\mathcal{F}$-graph. The $\mathcal{F}$-isolation number of a graph $G$, denoted by $ι(G, \mathcal{F})$, is the size of a smallest set $D$ of vertices of $G$ such that the closed neighbourhood of $D$ intersects the vertex sets of the $\mathcal{F}$-graphs contained by $G$ (equivalently, $G-N[D]$ contains no $\mathcal{F}$-graph). Let $\mathcal{C}$ be the set of cycles, and let $\mathcal{C}'$ be the set of non-triangle cycles (that is, cycles of length at least $4$). Let $G$ be a connected graph having exactly $n$ vertices and $m$ edges. The first author proved that $ι(G,\mathcal{C}) \leq n/4$ if $G$ is not a triangle. Bartolo and the authors proved that $ι(G,\{C_4\}) \leq n/5$ if $G$ is not a copy of one of nine graphs. Various authors proved that $ι(G,\mathcal{C}) \leq (m+1)/5$ if $G$ is not a triangle. We prove that $ι(G,\mathcal{C}') \leq (m+1)/6$ if $G$ is not a $4$-cycle. Zhang and Wu established this for the case where $G$ is triangle-free. Our result yields the inequality $ι(G,\{C_4\}) \leq (m+1)/6$ of Wei, Zhang and Zhao. These bounds are attained by infinitely many (non-isomorphic) graphs. The proof of our inequality hinges on also determining the graphs attaining the bound.

Isolation of non-triangle cycles in graphs

TL;DR

The paper addresses the problem of bounding the F-isolation number for non-triangle cycles in graphs. It introduces the concept of F-isolating sets and focuses on the non-triangle cycle family , establishing a tight bound for connected graphs with edges that are not 4-cycles, and fully characterizes the equality cases as pure -special graphs or -graphs. The result unifies and extends prior bounds for cycle families and yields as a corollary , aligning with previous work by Wei, Zhang and Zhao. The extremal graphs form infinite families, and the proof relies on a structural decomposition, induction on , and a detailed analysis of residual components classified into specific special graph families, revealing the configurations that achieve equality. This contributes a precise understanding of cycle-avoidance via vertex neighborhoods and provides a framework for similar isolation-number bounds in related graph families.

Abstract

Given a set of graphs, we call a copy of a graph in an -graph. The -isolation number of a graph , denoted by , is the size of a smallest set of vertices of such that the closed neighbourhood of intersects the vertex sets of the -graphs contained by (equivalently, contains no -graph). Let be the set of cycles, and let be the set of non-triangle cycles (that is, cycles of length at least ). Let be a connected graph having exactly vertices and edges. The first author proved that if is not a triangle. Bartolo and the authors proved that if is not a copy of one of nine graphs. Various authors proved that if is not a triangle. We prove that if is not a -cycle. Zhang and Wu established this for the case where is triangle-free. Our result yields the inequality of Wei, Zhang and Zhao. These bounds are attained by infinitely many (non-isomorphic) graphs. The proof of our inequality hinges on also determining the graphs attaining the bound.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 2 sections, 10 theorems, 26 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

If $G$ is a connected $n$-vertex graph that is not a triangle, then Moreover, the bound is sharp.

Theorems & Definitions (10)

  • Theorem 1: Borg1
  • Theorem 2: Borg4CZZW2
  • Theorem 3
  • Lemma 1: Borg1
  • Lemma 2: Borg1Borg4
  • Lemma 3: BBS
  • Corollary 1: BBS
  • Corollary 2
  • Lemma 4
  • Proposition 1