Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Rearrangements of distributions on integers that minimize variance

Aistis Atminas, Valentas Kurauskas

TL;DR

This work establishes a discrete analogue of rearrangement inequalities by showing that, for any finite integer-supported distribution, the variance is minimized by a specific left-right symmetric rearrangement $X^+$ that assigns the largest probability to $0$, the next to $1$, then to $-1$, and so on. The authors place the result in a general dispersion framework $D_f(X)$ with minimizers $M_f(X)$ and leverage a rearrangement-based comparison to prove $\mathrm{Var}\, X^+ \le \mathrm{Var}\, X$, with equality only in translations or sign-flips of the distribution. The main proof analyzes $D_f(X)$ via a sorted probability vector and the corresponding distance-function vectors, using the distance to the nearest integer $a'$ and a constructed nondecreasing vector ${\bf w}$ to bound $D_f(X)$ by $D_f(X^+)$. The results specialize to $f(x)=x^2$ (variance) and related $f$ yielding MAD, providing a concise, self-contained discrete analogue to continuous rearrangement phenomena and informing equality cases in discrete inverse problems.

Abstract

Which permutations of a probability distribution on integers minimize variance? Let $X$ be a random variable on a set of integers $\{x_1, \dots, x_N\}$ such that $\mathbb{P}(X_i = x_i) = p_i$, $i \in \{1,\dots,N\}$. Let $(p^{(1)}, \dots, p^{(N)})$ be the sequence $(p_1, \dots, p_N)$ ordered non-increasingly. Let $X^+$ be the random variable defined by $\mathbb{P}(X=0)=p^{(1)}$, $\mathbb{P}(X=1) = p^{(2)}$, $\mathbb{P}(X=-1)=p^{(3)}, \dots, \mathbb{P}(X=(-1)^N \lfloor \frac {N} 2 \rfloor)=p^{(N)}$. In this short note we generalize and prove the inequality $\mathrm{Var}\, X^+ \le \mathrm{Var}\, X$.

Rearrangements of distributions on integers that minimize variance

TL;DR

This work establishes a discrete analogue of rearrangement inequalities by showing that, for any finite integer-supported distribution, the variance is minimized by a specific left-right symmetric rearrangement that assigns the largest probability to , the next to , then to , and so on. The authors place the result in a general dispersion framework with minimizers and leverage a rearrangement-based comparison to prove , with equality only in translations or sign-flips of the distribution. The main proof analyzes via a sorted probability vector and the corresponding distance-function vectors, using the distance to the nearest integer and a constructed nondecreasing vector to bound by . The results specialize to (variance) and related yielding MAD, providing a concise, self-contained discrete analogue to continuous rearrangement phenomena and informing equality cases in discrete inverse problems.

Abstract

Which permutations of a probability distribution on integers minimize variance? Let be a random variable on a set of integers such that , . Let be the sequence ordered non-increasingly. Let be the random variable defined by , , . In this short note we generalize and prove the inequality .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 2 sections, 2 theorems, 17 equations.

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Proofs

Key Result

Theorem 1.2

Let $X$ be a random variable supported on a finite set of integers. Assume that $f: [0, +\infty] \to [0, +\infty)$ is non-decreasing. Then Furthermore, suppose that $f(x)$ has a positive derivative for $x > 0$ and a right derivative at $0$ such that $f'(0+) = 0$. Then (eq.main) is strict unless $X-k$ is distributed as $X^+$ or $-X^+$ for some integer $k$.

Theorems & Definitions (3)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Corollary 1.3