LATIS: Galaxy-Environment Relations at Cosmic Noon and the Role of Sample Selection
Nima Chartab, Andrew B. Newman, Gwen C. Rudie, Guillermo Blanc, Daniel D. Kelson, Mahdi Qezlou, Simeon Bird, Brian C. Lemaux, Olga Cucciati
TL;DR
This study probes galaxy environment at cosmic noon ($z\sim2.5$) by combining Ly$\alpha$ forest tomography from LATIS with UV-selected spectroscopic galaxies and a heterogeneous COSMOS compilation, all interpreted through forward-modeling with IllustrisTNG300-1. The authors quantify how spectroscopic selection biases reshape environmental trends in stellar mass and specific star formation rate (sSFR), finding that mass-complete simulations predict rising $M_*$ and declining sSFR in overdense regions, while UV-selected samples (and photometric redshifts) erase or suppress these signals, and even produce mild reversals in some cases. Through a parametric sSFR model and multiple mock realizations, they show that selection effects primarily drive the observed trends, with quiescent/dusty populations being missed in UV-selected surveys; photometric redshift uncertainties further wash out genuine correlations. The work cautions against inferring physical environmental effects from incomplete samples at $z\sim2$–3 and argues for deeper, more representative spectroscopic surveys to robustly characterize environmental influences. Overall, the paper demonstrates the importance of modeling selection biases when interpreting environment–galaxy relationships during peak galaxy assembly.
Abstract
We investigate the environmental dependence of galaxy properties at $z\sim2.5$ using the Ly$α$ Tomography IMACS Survey (LATIS), which provides high-resolution three-dimensional maps of intergalactic medium (IGM) overdensity via Ly$α$ forest tomography. Our analysis focuses on a UV-selected spectroscopic sample of 2185 galaxies from LATIS and a complementary set of 1157 galaxies from heterogeneous spectroscopic surveys in the COSMOS field. We compare these datasets to forward-modeled mock catalogs constructed from the IllustrisTNG300-1 simulation, incorporating realistic selection functions to match both LATIS and the literature sample. While the mass-complete simulation predicts strong environmental trends--more massive and quiescent galaxies preferentially occupy overdense regions--we find that such trends are significantly weaker or absent in the observed samples. The LATIS galaxies show no measurable correlation between specific star formation rate (sSFR) and IGM overdensity, a result reproduced by LATIS-like mock catalogs, confirming that UV selection systematically excludes passive and dusty galaxies in dense environments. The literature compilation, despite improved high-mass coverage, remains incomplete and affected by similar biases. We also analyze a mass-complete photometric sample from the COSMOS-Web catalog at $z\sim2.5$ and find no detectable sSFR-environment relation, a null result that our simulations indicate can be explained by photometric redshift uncertainties. In particular, we find no evidence for a reversal of the sSFR-density relation at cosmic noon. These results demonstrate that observed correlations can be heavily shaped by selection effects, and caution against inferring physical trends from incomplete spectroscopic samples. Deeper, more representative spectroscopic surveys are needed to robustly characterize environmental effects at this epoch.
