Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Hopf bimodules for bialgebroids

Sophie Chemla, Niels Kowalzig

TL;DR

The paper generalizes classical Hopf module theory from Hopf algebras to left bialgebroids by defining four Hopf module variants and introducing Hopf bimodules (tetramodules) without requiring antipodes. It proves a Fundamental Theorem via Hopf-Galois comodules and establishes that the category of Hopf bimodules is equivalent to Yetter-Drinfel'd module categories, via coinvariants and induction functors, under suitable flatness/projectivity assumptions. It further develops monoidal and braided monoidal structures, showing two independent monoidal pictures on Hopf bimodules become braided-equivalent to Yetter-Drinfel'd module categories and to the monoidal centre of left U-modules. These results extend Schauenburg-type equivalences to bialgebroids, offering a robust framework for bialgebroid (co)homology, deformation theory, and representation theory in noncommutative base settings.

Abstract

Generalising a result for Hopf algebras, we not only define the four possible types of Hopf modules in the bialgebroid setting but also yield the notion of two-sided two-cosided Hopf modules, also known as Hopf bimodules or tetramodules, in this realm. By explicitly formulating a fundamental theorem for Hopf modules via the concept of Hopf-Galois comodules, we prove that the category of Hopf bimodules can be endowed with the structure of a (pre-)braided monoidal category in two different ways, which, in turn, are shown to be both braided monoidally equivalent to the category of Yetter-Drinfel'd modules, that is, to the monoidal centre of the category of left bialgebroid modules.

Hopf bimodules for bialgebroids

TL;DR

The paper generalizes classical Hopf module theory from Hopf algebras to left bialgebroids by defining four Hopf module variants and introducing Hopf bimodules (tetramodules) without requiring antipodes. It proves a Fundamental Theorem via Hopf-Galois comodules and establishes that the category of Hopf bimodules is equivalent to Yetter-Drinfel'd module categories, via coinvariants and induction functors, under suitable flatness/projectivity assumptions. It further develops monoidal and braided monoidal structures, showing two independent monoidal pictures on Hopf bimodules become braided-equivalent to Yetter-Drinfel'd module categories and to the monoidal centre of left U-modules. These results extend Schauenburg-type equivalences to bialgebroids, offering a robust framework for bialgebroid (co)homology, deformation theory, and representation theory in noncommutative base settings.

Abstract

Generalising a result for Hopf algebras, we not only define the four possible types of Hopf modules in the bialgebroid setting but also yield the notion of two-sided two-cosided Hopf modules, also known as Hopf bimodules or tetramodules, in this realm. By explicitly formulating a fundamental theorem for Hopf modules via the concept of Hopf-Galois comodules, we prove that the category of Hopf bimodules can be endowed with the structure of a (pre-)braided monoidal category in two different ways, which, in turn, are shown to be both braided monoidally equivalent to the category of Yetter-Drinfel'd modules, that is, to the monoidal centre of the category of left bialgebroid modules.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 13 sections, 12 theorems, 61 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $(U,A)$ be a right Hopf algebroid, that is, a left bialgebroid endowed with a (certain) invertible Hopf-Galois map, and let the right $A$-module $U_\smalltriangleleft$ be projective.

Theorems & Definitions (33)

  • Theorem
  • Theorem
  • Definition 1.1
  • Remark 1.2
  • Definition 1.3
  • Remark 1.4
  • Example 1.5
  • Definition 1.6
  • Remark 1.7
  • Proposition 1.8
  • ...and 23 more