Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Power Towers: Purely Inseparable Galois Theory and Foliations in Positive Characteristic

Przemysław Grabowski

TL;DR

This work delivers a unified, Galois-type framework for purely inseparable phenomena in positive characteristic by tying purely inseparable morphisms to finite subalgebras of differential operators. It introduces power towers as foliation-like objects that organize subfields and operator data, and proves Galois-type correspondences for both fields and varieties, with explicit constructions such as Jacobson sequences and saturated subalgebras. A canonical divisor pullback formula for arbitrary purely inseparable morphisms is established, enabling new non-Lüroth-type conclusions in high characteristic. By connecting Jacobson–Bourbaki, Ekedahl, and higher-derivation approaches within a single theory, the paper opens new directions for positive-characteristic geometry and the study of foliations via differential-operator algebras.

Abstract

We build a purely inseparable Galois theory using non-derived commutative algebra. Our theory works on fields and on normal varieties. It says that a purely inseparable morphism corresponds to a finite (saturated) subalgebra of differential operators. Our approach unifies most of the literature about purely inseparable morphisms and shows new research directions. Indeed, our theory extends to a theory that covers all (saturated) subalgebras of differential operators. The extended theory gives a correspondence between the subalgebras and a new notion of \textbf{power towers}. A power tower is an object analogous to a foliation from differential geometry. In particular, it admits its own versions of many key results about foliations, such as a ``fibrations inject into foliations'' and a ``Frobenius theorem''. The latter has a nontrivial twist: the local structure is trivial at every point, but it may differ between points! In general, our analogy between power towers and foliations explains why purely inseparable morphisms are foliation-like, because these morphisms are power towers in an explicit way. Finally, we use our theory to produce a formula for pullbacks of canonical divisors for arbitrary purely inseparable morphisms. We use it to conclude some ``not-L{ü}roth theorems'': if the characteristic is high enough, then any variety purely inseparably covered by an $n$-dimensional projective space has Iitaka dimension equal to $-\infty$ or $n$, i.e., it is not zero.

Power Towers: Purely Inseparable Galois Theory and Foliations in Positive Characteristic

TL;DR

This work delivers a unified, Galois-type framework for purely inseparable phenomena in positive characteristic by tying purely inseparable morphisms to finite subalgebras of differential operators. It introduces power towers as foliation-like objects that organize subfields and operator data, and proves Galois-type correspondences for both fields and varieties, with explicit constructions such as Jacobson sequences and saturated subalgebras. A canonical divisor pullback formula for arbitrary purely inseparable morphisms is established, enabling new non-Lüroth-type conclusions in high characteristic. By connecting Jacobson–Bourbaki, Ekedahl, and higher-derivation approaches within a single theory, the paper opens new directions for positive-characteristic geometry and the study of foliations via differential-operator algebras.

Abstract

We build a purely inseparable Galois theory using non-derived commutative algebra. Our theory works on fields and on normal varieties. It says that a purely inseparable morphism corresponds to a finite (saturated) subalgebra of differential operators. Our approach unifies most of the literature about purely inseparable morphisms and shows new research directions. Indeed, our theory extends to a theory that covers all (saturated) subalgebras of differential operators. The extended theory gives a correspondence between the subalgebras and a new notion of \textbf{power towers}. A power tower is an object analogous to a foliation from differential geometry. In particular, it admits its own versions of many key results about foliations, such as a ``fibrations inject into foliations'' and a ``Frobenius theorem''. The latter has a nontrivial twist: the local structure is trivial at every point, but it may differ between points! In general, our analogy between power towers and foliations explains why purely inseparable morphisms are foliation-like, because these morphisms are power towers in an explicit way. Finally, we use our theory to produce a formula for pullbacks of canonical divisors for arbitrary purely inseparable morphisms. We use it to conclude some ``not-L{ü}roth theorems'': if the characteristic is high enough, then any variety purely inseparably covered by an -dimensional projective space has Iitaka dimension equal to or , i.e., it is not zero.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 69 sections, 85 theorems, 280 equations, 4 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.10

Each of the following data from Example intro - example can be computed from any other: Explicitly, these computations are done by the following operations: Above, we used the notation: $X=\operatorname{Spec}(k[x,y]), Y_n=\operatorname{Spec}(k[x^{p^n},y])$.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: A visualization of a subalgebra $\mathcal{D}\subset \operatorname{Diff}_k(K)$ for orders satisfying $n>r_1>r_2=r_3>r_4=r_5=\ldots>0$, where $p^{r_i}=[W_{i}:W_{i-1}]$ for $i>0$.
  • Figure 2: A visualisation of a subalgebra corresponding to a $\infty$-foliation.
  • Figure 3: The Jacobson sequence for $k[x^{p^2}, y^p, y^{p+1}-x^p]\to k[x,y]$.
  • Figure 4: A visualization of being non-Ekedahl for $k[x^{p^2},y^p, y^{p+1}-x^p]\to k[x,y]$.

Theorems & Definitions (292)

  • Definition 1.1: Purely Inseparable Ring Map
  • Definition 1.2: Purely Inseparable Morphism
  • Definition 1.5: Up to $p^n$-powers.
  • Definition 1.6: Power Tower
  • Example 1.9
  • Theorem 1.10: Galois-Type Correspondence for a Power Tower
  • Theorem 1.11: Slogan version of Theorem \ref{['lifting => extension - thm']}
  • Theorem 1.12: Canonical Divisor Formula: Theorems \ref{['Canonical Divisor Formula - theorem']} and \ref{['canonical divisor for n-foli and ekedahl - prop']}
  • Theorem 1.14: Theorem \ref{['big not-luroth theorem']}
  • Definition 2.1
  • ...and 282 more