The effect of extended radio emission on SMBH accretion rate estimates
Stergios Amarantidis, Duncan Farrah, Nick Seymour, Mark Lacy, Iris Breda, Bodo Ziegler, Olmo Piana, Miguel Sánchez-Portal
TL;DR
This study addresses biases in SMBH accretion-rate estimates caused by using unresolved total radio flux, which blends current accretion with relic jet/lobe power. It introduces a two-episode framework that separately evaluates current ($L_{ m bol,curr}$, $L_{ m mech,core}$) and past ($L_{ m bol,past}$, $L_{ m mech,past}$) accretion, and compares these to literature estimates based on total radio output. Applying this to 121 local radio galaxies, the authors find that traditional methods overestimate the Eddington-scaled rate by a factor of about $3$, misclassifying accretion modes in ~11% of sources, with the bias increasing for more extended systems. The results highlight the importance of core-focused measurements for reliable accretion-state inferences and have implications for AGN unification, high-redshift surveys, and studies of episodic accretion, while recognizing substantial uncertainties in the normalization and scaling relations used. Overall, the work provides a framework to derive systematic accretion-rate corrections when high-resolution data enable separation of core and extended radio components.
Abstract
Accretion rates in radio galaxies are typically estimated from optical and total radio flux measurements, incorporating emission from the core, jets, and lobes. These estimates can be used to investigate the link between observed Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) emission properties and the underlying accretion physics of their Super-Massive Black Holes (SMBHs). However, while optical and core radio emission trace the ongoing accretion episode, extended jet and lobe structures may result from past AGN activity. Therefore, accretion rates inferred from spatially unresolved radio observations may be systematically overestimated, a bias whose prevalence and extent have yet to be thoroughly explored. In this study, using a sample of 121 local radio-loud galaxies with spatially resolved radio components, we assess this effect by estimating their \textit{Eddington}-scaled accretion rates ($λ$) using both the common methodology which considers total radio fluxes and a simple but novel approach that treats core and extended emission as signatures of distinct accretion phases. Our results show that the former method systematically overestimates the $λ$ by a factor of $\sim 3$, affecting the accretion mode classification in approximately $11\%$ of sources. This discrepancy appears to correlate with radio size, with the most extended galaxies indicating a transition in accretion disk mode. Such a bias could affect AGN classification in unresolved high-redshift radio surveys. Our results motivate re-examining accretion rate calculations from AGN radio surveys and align with the AGN unification model for radio galaxies, revealing a clearer link between accretion disk physics and optical spectral properties.
