Coherent estimation of risk measures
Martin Aichele, Igor Cialenco, Damian Jelito, Marcin Pitera
TL;DR
The paper develops a coherent risk estimator (CRE) framework that mirrors the axioms of coherent risk measures, links CREs to robust representations via $L$-estimators, and shows that law-invariant CREs correspond to suprema over weighted order-statistic estimators. It proves that comonotonic, law-invariant CREs reduce to a single $L$-estimator and analyzes consistency results for CREs in i.i.d. settings, with a focus on spectral risk measures and ES plug-in estimators. A detailed numerical study compares six ES estimators based on $L$-statistics under i.i.d. and overlapping data, illustrating how weighting schemes affect accuracy, bias, and regulatory applicability (FRTB). The results provide guidance on constructing CREs with sound financial and statistical properties and on selecting ES estimators in practice, especially in regulatory contexts.
Abstract
We develop a statistical framework for risk estimation, inspired by the axiomatic theory of risk measures. Coherent risk estimators -- functionals of P&L samples inheriting the economic properties of risk measures -- are defined and characterized through robust representations linked to $L$-estimators. The framework provides a canonical methodology for constructing estimators with sound financial and statistical properties, unifying risk measure theory, principles for capital adequacy, and practical statistical challenges in market risk. A numerical study illustrates the approach, focusing on expected shortfall estimation under both i.i.d. and overlapping samples relevant for regulatory FRTB model applications.
