Generative Inverse Design: From Single Point Optimization to a Diverse Design Portfolio via Conditional Variational Autoencoders
Muhammad Arif Hakimi Zamrai
TL;DR
The paper reframes inverse design fromSeeking a single optimal solution to generating a diverse portfolio of high-performing designs using a Conditional Variational Autoencoder (CVAE) conditioned on target performance. It demonstrates on the NASA airfoil self-noise task that the CVAE can produce 241 valid designs (94.1% validity) and that 77.2% of these designs outperform the SBO baseline in surrogate-predicted performance, with a top result of 74.83 dB. The approach learns a global design manifold, enabling rapid, parallel synthesis of diverse candidates and facilitating multi-criteria decision-making in engineering design. While validated with a surrogate, the method shows promise for accelerated innovation and richer design exploration, with future work focusing on high-fidelity validation and scalability via active learning.
Abstract
Inverse design, which seeks to find optimal parameters for a target output, is a central challenge in engineering. Surrogate-based optimization (SBO) has become a standard approach, yet it is fundamentally structured to converge to a single-point solution, thereby limiting design space exploration and ignoring potentially valuable alternative topologies. This paper presents a paradigm shift from single-point optimization to generative inverse design. We introduce a framework based on a Conditional Variational Autoencoder (CVAE) that learns a probabilistic mapping between a system's design parameters and its performance, enabling the generation of a diverse portfolio of high-performing candidates conditioned on a specific performance objective. We apply this methodology to the complex, non-linear problem of minimizing airfoil self-noise, using a high-performing SBO method from a prior benchmark study as a rigorous baseline. The CVAE framework successfully generated 256 novel designs with a 94.1\% validity rate. A subsequent surrogate-based evaluation revealed that 77.2\% of these valid designs achieved superior performance compared to the single optimal design found by the SBO baseline. This work demonstrates that the generative approach not only discovers higher-quality solutions but also provides a rich portfolio of diverse candidates, fundamentally enhancing the engineering design process by enabling multi-criteria decision-making.
