Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Validity condition of normal form transformation for the $β$-FPUT system

Boyang Wu, Miguel Onorato, Zaher Hani, Yulin Pan

TL;DR

The paper addresses the validity of a normal-form transformation that removes non-resonant cubic terms in the β-FPUT chain under random-phase spectra. It proves a rigorous probabilistic bound $β \ll 1/N^{1+ε}$, tying the importance of non-resonant interactions to the product $βN$ and supporting the result with hypercontractivity-based estimates and Wick contractions. Numerical tests with a sixth-order symplectic integrator show that the non-resonant term fraction collapses onto a universal curve when plotted against $βN$ for both thermal-equilibrium and out-of-equilibrium states, validating the theoretical condition. The findings yield a practical criterion for parameter choices and a broadly applicable methodology for normal-form analysis in Hamiltonian systems, including justified use in deriving wave-kinetic equations.

Abstract

In this work, we provide a validity condition for the normal form transformation to remove the non-resonant cubic terms in the $β$-FPUT system. We show that for a wave field with random phases, the normal form transformation is valid by dominant probability if $β\ll 1/N^{1+ε}$, with $N$ the number of masses and $ε$ an arbitrarily small constant. To obtain this condition, a bound is needed for a summation in the transformation equation, which we prove rigorously in the paper. The condition also suggests that the importance of the non-resonant terms in the evolution equation is governed by the parameter $βN$. We design numerical experiments to demonstrate that this is indeed the case for spectra at both thermal-equilibrium and out-of-equilibrium conditions. The methodology developed in this paper is applicable to other Hamiltonian systems where a normal form transformation needs to be applied.

Validity condition of normal form transformation for the $β$-FPUT system

TL;DR

The paper addresses the validity of a normal-form transformation that removes non-resonant cubic terms in the β-FPUT chain under random-phase spectra. It proves a rigorous probabilistic bound , tying the importance of non-resonant interactions to the product and supporting the result with hypercontractivity-based estimates and Wick contractions. Numerical tests with a sixth-order symplectic integrator show that the non-resonant term fraction collapses onto a universal curve when plotted against for both thermal-equilibrium and out-of-equilibrium states, validating the theoretical condition. The findings yield a practical criterion for parameter choices and a broadly applicable methodology for normal-form analysis in Hamiltonian systems, including justified use in deriving wave-kinetic equations.

Abstract

In this work, we provide a validity condition for the normal form transformation to remove the non-resonant cubic terms in the -FPUT system. We show that for a wave field with random phases, the normal form transformation is valid by dominant probability if , with the number of masses and an arbitrarily small constant. To obtain this condition, a bound is needed for a summation in the transformation equation, which we prove rigorously in the paper. The condition also suggests that the importance of the non-resonant terms in the evolution equation is governed by the parameter . We design numerical experiments to demonstrate that this is indeed the case for spectra at both thermal-equilibrium and out-of-equilibrium conditions. The methodology developed in this paper is applicable to other Hamiltonian systems where a normal form transformation needs to be applied.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 6 sections, 1 theorem, 23 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Theorem 3.1

Let $A^{(i)}_{1,2,3,4}$, $i=1,2,3$, be defined as in A-1,A-2, and A-3, then for fixed $k_1 \in \mathbb{Z} \cap (0,N)$, we have:

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Ratio $r$ as a function of $\beta N$ for $N = 200$, $500$, $800$, and $1000$, with initial conditions (a) at thermal equilibrium with \ref{['ic-eq']} and (b) out of thermal equilibrium with \ref{['ic-oeq']}.

Theorems & Definitions (1)

  • Theorem 3.1