Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Mixed WIMP-FIMP scenario in a two-component dark matter model

XinXin Qi, Hao Sun

TL;DR

The work analyzes a two-component dark matter model stabilized by a $Z_2\times Z_4$ symmetry, introducing a singlet scalar $S$ and a Majorana fermion $\chi$ with an additional singlet $S_0$ that acquires a vev to generate $\chi$ mass after symmetry breaking. It investigates two mixed WIMP-FIMP scenarios under a decoupling limit: Case I where $\chi$ is the WIMP and $S$ the FIMP, and Case II with $S$ as the WIMP and $\chi$ as the FIMP, solving the coupled Boltzmann equations and applying relic-density and direct-detection constraints. Case I yields viable parameter space across broad mass ranges, requiring $y_{sf}$ to exceed unity and allowing $S$ to dominate the DM when $\lambda_{ds}$ or $\lambda_{dh}$ are above roughly $10^{-11}$–$10^{-12}$. Case II is more constrained by direct detection, yet reveals two allowed regions around $m_S \approx m_1/2$ and $m_S \gtrsim 400$ GeV, with the latter enabling a light scalar DM mass down to a few hundred GeV in some contexts. Overall, the mixed WIMP-FIMP framework demonstrates how multi-component DM can reconcile relic-density requirements with stringent direct-detection bounds, opening viable parameter spaces not available to single-component WIMP models.

Abstract

We consider the mixed WIMP-FIMP scenario in a two-component dark matter model with $Z_2 \times Z_4$ symmetry, where a singlet scalar $S$ and a Majarano fermion $χ$ are introduced as dark matter candidates. We also introduce another singlet scalar $S_0$ with a non-zero vacuum expectation value to the SM so that the fermion dark matter can obtain mass after spontaneous symmetry breaking. Either $S$ or $χ$ relic density can be generated via the "Freeze-out" mechanism. In contrast, the other DM candidate relic density is obtained by the "Freeze-in" mechanism, and we therefore have two different cases. In the case of $χ$ as WIMP and $S$ as FIMP, we perform random scans to estimate the allowed parameter space consistent with the dark matter constraint. The results show that this case is viable over a wide range of dark matter masses with the Yukawa coupling of $S_0$ and $χ$ should be larger than 1. Instead, for the case of $S$ as WIMP and $χ$ as FIMP, the viable parameter space is more constrained by the direct detection experiements, and we have two regions with $m_S \approx 62.5$ GeV and $m_S>400$ GeV under the constraints, which is consistent with the singlet scalar DM result but the scalar DM mass can be as low as a few hundred GeV for the heavy mass region in the model.

Mixed WIMP-FIMP scenario in a two-component dark matter model

TL;DR

The work analyzes a two-component dark matter model stabilized by a symmetry, introducing a singlet scalar and a Majorana fermion with an additional singlet that acquires a vev to generate mass after symmetry breaking. It investigates two mixed WIMP-FIMP scenarios under a decoupling limit: Case I where is the WIMP and the FIMP, and Case II with as the WIMP and as the FIMP, solving the coupled Boltzmann equations and applying relic-density and direct-detection constraints. Case I yields viable parameter space across broad mass ranges, requiring to exceed unity and allowing to dominate the DM when or are above roughly . Case II is more constrained by direct detection, yet reveals two allowed regions around and GeV, with the latter enabling a light scalar DM mass down to a few hundred GeV in some contexts. Overall, the mixed WIMP-FIMP framework demonstrates how multi-component DM can reconcile relic-density requirements with stringent direct-detection bounds, opening viable parameter spaces not available to single-component WIMP models.

Abstract

We consider the mixed WIMP-FIMP scenario in a two-component dark matter model with symmetry, where a singlet scalar and a Majarano fermion are introduced as dark matter candidates. We also introduce another singlet scalar with a non-zero vacuum expectation value to the SM so that the fermion dark matter can obtain mass after spontaneous symmetry breaking. Either or relic density can be generated via the "Freeze-out" mechanism. In contrast, the other DM candidate relic density is obtained by the "Freeze-in" mechanism, and we therefore have two different cases. In the case of as WIMP and as FIMP, we perform random scans to estimate the allowed parameter space consistent with the dark matter constraint. The results show that this case is viable over a wide range of dark matter masses with the Yukawa coupling of and should be larger than 1. Instead, for the case of as WIMP and as FIMP, the viable parameter space is more constrained by the direct detection experiements, and we have two regions with GeV and GeV under the constraints, which is consistent with the singlet scalar DM result but the scalar DM mass can be as low as a few hundred GeV for the heavy mass region in the model.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 18 sections, 31 equations, 9 figures, 1 table.

Figures (9)

  • Figure 1: Evolutions of $\Omega_{\chi}h^2$ (left) and $\Omega_S h^2$ (right) with $m_{\chi}$. We fix $m_2=1000$ GeV, $m_S=50$ GeV, $\lambda_{ds}=10^{-8}$,$\lambda_{dh}=10^{-11}$,$y_{sf}=1$ as benchmark values corresponding to the yellow lines , and other colored lines represent one of the above parameters varying.
  • Figure 2: Viable parameter space of $m_{\chi}-y_{sf}$ (a), $m_S-\lambda_{dh}$ (b) and $\lambda_{ds}-\lambda_{dh}$ (c) under dark matter relic density constraint in the case of $m_S<m_1/2$.
  • Figure 3: Viable parameter space of $m_{\chi}-y_{sf}$ (a), $m_S-\lambda_{dh}$ (b) and $\lambda_{ds}-\lambda_{dh}$ (c) under dark matter relic density constraint in the case of $m_1/2<m_S<m_2/2$.
  • Figure 4: Viable parameter space of $m_{\chi}-y_{sf}$ (a), $m_S-\lambda_{dh}$ (b) and $\lambda_{ds}-\lambda_{dh}$ (c) under dark matter relic density constraint in the case of $m_S>m_2/2$.
  • Figure 5: Evolutions of $\Omega_Sh^2$ (left) and $\Omega_{\chi} h^2$ (right) with $m_S$. We fix $m_2=1000$ GeV, $m_{\chi}= 550$ GeV, $\lambda_{ds}=10^{-8}$,$\lambda_{dh}=1$,$y_{sf}=10^{-11}$ as benchmark values corresponding to the yellow lines , and other colored lines represent one of the above parameters varying.
  • ...and 4 more figures