Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Entropy-energy solutions for Thermo-Visco-Elastic systems with Mróz-type inelastic behavior

Tomasz Cieślak, Sebastian Owczarek, Karolina Wielgos

TL;DR

The paper addresses global solvability for a thermo-visco-elastic system with temperature-dependent coefficients and Mróz-type inelasticity by framing a weak entropy-energy solution that respects thermodynamic consistency. It introduces a two-level semi-Galerkin approximation, reformulates the energy balance as an entropy equation, and leverages Young measures and Minty arguments to handle nonlinear dissipation. The main result proves the existence of a global-in-time weak entropy-energy solution with a defect measure, along with a total energy-dissipation inequality and preservation of positivity for the temperature. This work advances the mathematical analysis of temperature-dependent inelastic materials without relying on favorable structural assumptions like Kelvin-Voigt regularization, offering a robust framework for thermodynamically consistent existence results in multi-dimensional settings.

Abstract

In this article, we study a thermodynamically consistent thermo-visco-elastic model describing the balance of internal energy in a heat-conducting inelastic body. In the considered problem, the temperature dependence appears in both the elastic and inelastic constitutive relations. For such a system, we introduce the concept of a weak entropy-energy solution, which satisfies the entropy equality instead of the internal energy equation. Although the model does not possess any mathematically favorable structural properties, such as Kelvin-Voigt type effects or simplifications eliminating temperature from the constitutive relations, we prove the global-in-time existence of weak entropy-energy solutions for large initial data.

Entropy-energy solutions for Thermo-Visco-Elastic systems with Mróz-type inelastic behavior

TL;DR

The paper addresses global solvability for a thermo-visco-elastic system with temperature-dependent coefficients and Mróz-type inelasticity by framing a weak entropy-energy solution that respects thermodynamic consistency. It introduces a two-level semi-Galerkin approximation, reformulates the energy balance as an entropy equation, and leverages Young measures and Minty arguments to handle nonlinear dissipation. The main result proves the existence of a global-in-time weak entropy-energy solution with a defect measure, along with a total energy-dissipation inequality and preservation of positivity for the temperature. This work advances the mathematical analysis of temperature-dependent inelastic materials without relying on favorable structural assumptions like Kelvin-Voigt regularization, offering a robust framework for thermodynamically consistent existence results in multi-dimensional settings.

Abstract

In this article, we study a thermodynamically consistent thermo-visco-elastic model describing the balance of internal energy in a heat-conducting inelastic body. In the considered problem, the temperature dependence appears in both the elastic and inelastic constitutive relations. For such a system, we introduce the concept of a weak entropy-energy solution, which satisfies the entropy equality instead of the internal energy equation. Although the model does not possess any mathematically favorable structural properties, such as Kelvin-Voigt type effects or simplifications eliminating temperature from the constitutive relations, we prove the global-in-time existence of weak entropy-energy solutions for large initial data.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 14 sections, 12 theorems, 156 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.2

(Main result) Let the elasticity tensor $\mathbb{C}:\mathcal{S}^3 \to \mathcal{S}^3$ be symmetric and positive definite. Additionally, let us assume that given data $u_{0}$, $u_{1}$, $\mathbb{T}_{0}$, $\tau_{0}$, $e^{\tau_{0}}$ and $f$ have the regularities specified in conditions p_1 and p_6 and th

Theorems & Definitions (33)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 2.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Remark 2.3
  • Proposition 3.1
  • proof
  • Remark 3.2
  • ...and 23 more